October 03, 2016

Decryption Mandates and Global Internet Freedom: Toward a Pragmatic Approach

By Adam Klein

What effect would a U.S. decryption mandate have for international human rights? Would Burr-Feinstein or something like it hurt dissidents and journalists living under authoritarian governments? It depends who you ask—but the answer you get will probably tell you more about that person’s view of the domestic decryption debate than about how other nations are likely to respond to U.S. encryption policy.

In the attached essay, I argue for a more pragmatic, realistic, and factually informed debate over the international consequences of U.S. encryption policy.  Below are a few key points on the matter.

To read the full essay, visit the Lawfare website.

  • Podcast
    • September 10, 2019
    When your data is held hostage

    Technology and security expert Kara Frederick explains how and why U.S. local governments and electoral rolls are vulnerable to ransomware and what can be done about it. List...

    By Kara Frederick

  • Commentary
    • Lawfare
    • August 13, 2019
    Setting the Stage for U.S. Leadership in 6G

    Every day there are more headlines about China’s rise in 5G, the next generation of wireless communications technologies, and the economic and national security risksto the Un...

    By Martijn Rasser

  • Commentary
    • April 24, 2019
    The National Security Imperative of Protecting User Data

    Privacy legislation directed at 21st-century technology platforms and internet companies is not just about privacy; it is also important to address modern-day national securit...

    By Carrie Cordero

  • Video
    • April 21, 2019
    FBI facial recognition software under fire for privacy concerns

    Is the technology a must-need tool to solve crimes or a slippery slope? Kara Frederick joins Fox and Friends to discuss. View the full conversation on Fox and Friends: Wat...

    By Kara Frederick

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia