February 23, 2022

Don't Trust the Process: Moving from Words to Actions on the Indo-Pacific Posture

This article was originally published by War on the Rocks.

Far from being a deterrent to aggression, American military bases in Asia are a tempting target. U.S. Indo-Pacific bases are vulnerable to myriad Chinese attacks. Threats to airbases are especially worrying since they host so much concentrated U.S. combat power, incentivizing a Chinese first strike. Actions to address these problems have been tardy and insufficient, despite repeated Pentagon statements prioritizing U.S. posture in the region.

Few defense analysts focused on the Indo-Pacific would quibble with these statements, yet these problems continue, and solutions remain unclear. Two recent War on the Rocks articles by my colleagues Stacie Pettyjohn and Dustin Walker aptly describe the Pentagon’s failure to improve U.S. posture in the Indo-Pacific. Pettyjohn cites a Cold War-era Air Force chief of staff who emphatically argued for airbase resiliency in Europe as a model for today’s senior leaders to advocate for passive defenses. Walker prods the secretary and deputy secretary of defense to take a more aggressive role on force posture. Both argue that these problems cannot be solved absent senior leader engagement.

Moving from words to poured concrete requires subordinate organizations and processes to execute guidance and policies.

I agree with both authors that senior leader engagement is necessary, but I believe the Pentagon also needs to reform the processes and organizations responsible for overseeing posture. Secretaries and service chiefs should prioritize posture, but they can’t fix this issue without help.

Fixing the Indo-Pacific posture will require targeted policies to incentivize the implementation of posture initiatives in the near term in addition to long-term reforms to ensure that posture considerations have a more prominent role in the defense budgeting process.

Read the full article from War on the Rocks.

  • Commentary

    Defense

    CNAS Insights | America Isn’t Ready for a Drone War

    This week, U.S. personnel near El Paso, Texas, tested a high-energy laser as part of their mission to shoot down cartel drones along the southern border. The resulting confusi...

    By Stacie Pettyjohn & Molly Campbell

    • February 12, 2026
  • Commentary

    Defense / Indo-Pacific Security

    Trump’s NATO Dilemma

    This article was originally published in Foreign Affairs. Last November, Matthew Whitaker, the U.S. ambassador to NATO, startled a gathering of European officials at the Berl...

    By Sara Moller

    • Foreign Affairs
    • February 12, 2026
  • Video

    Defense

    What to Expect From U.S., Iran Talks Friday in Oman?

    Bloomberg's Becca Wasser & Wayne Sanders state they are not optimistic when discussing what they expect from the US and Iran when both countries speak Friday in Oman. They sug...

    By Becca Wasser

    • February 6, 2026
  • Commentary

    Defense

    Opposites Attract (and Execute)

    Introduction The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) in recent months has signaled interest in bringing new entrants into the defense industrial base (DIB), including venture-bac...

    By Veronica Daigle & Grace Newsom

    • February 5, 2026

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia