Ballistic missile defense (BMD) is both expensive and largely unproven;1 so on what basis might we judge its value? This article offers a US perspective about the utility of BMD in support of Korean security. At the regional level, it is a logical hedge in a modern security environment filled with long-range precision weapons. On the Korean Peninsula, it is a responsible counter against the growth and consolidation of North Korea’s nuclear weapons and missile programs. And within the US-ROK alliance, it increases the likelihood of US commitment to the ROK in the event of a crisis or conflict on the peninsula. Beyond these rational, material incentives to pursue BMD in the ROK, there is also an overwhelming ideational consideration: in light of Chinese warnings against pursuing certain types of BMD, officials in the United States and around the region may view ROK decisions about BMD as a leading indicator of loyalty in a long-term strategic competition between China and the United States. In this way, BMD in Korea is about far more than Korea.
America's Economic Future Hinges on Its Partnership with Asia
By Richard Fontaine & Dr. Daniel Kliman
Trump and His Strategy of Ambiguity
By Jerry Hendrix
Dr. Patrick Cronin on Fox: Is a new Cold War with China brewing?
By Dr. Patrick M. Cronin
David Asher on CNN: US military drills postponed - a win for Kim?
By David Asher