August 03, 2022
Help U.S. Companies Compete Against China on Technology Standards
The Chinese government has made leadership in international technology standards setting a key priority and it is working to give their firms an unfair leg up. While the U.S. government needs to defend the current voluntary, industry-led standards process in the face of this unfair competition, they also need to play a more active helping role. To do that Congress should modify the research and experimentation tax credit to allow international standard setting costs to qualify as expenditures for purpose of the credit. This will help U.S. firms better afford standards setting activities, helping them win over China.
What makes standards and the standard-setting process even more important now is the geopolitical context. Technology is the main enabler of economic, political, and military power.
Standards are universal technical specifications agreed to usually by commercial actors, and sometimes involving governments and non-governmental organizations. The standard-setting process is a voluntary one, typically conducted on an international basis and led by industry. The spirit and intent of standard-setting is based on technological merit; the best technology is chosen as standard.
When standards are global, they underpin interoperability around the world and facilitate trade. Think, for example, of how one can seamlessly use a new smart phone almost anywhere in the world. A concerted effort toward standardization eliminated the need to swap SIM cards to connect to another country’s cellular network. At the same time, charging that phone abroad is likely to require an adapter to fit one of the 15 wall socket designs in use internationally because electric plug standards were developed before global standards were the norm.
Real the full article from RealClearPolicy.
More from CNAS
-
Five Objectives to Guide U.S. AI Diffusion
Commentary
The Framework for AI Diffusion (the Framework) is an ambitious proposal to shape the global distribution of critical AI capabilities, maintain U.S. AI leadership, and prevent ...
By Janet Egan & Spencer Michaels
-
Shaping the World’s AI Future: How the U.S. and China Compete to Promote Their Digital Visions
Commentary
As the United States navigates evolving global AI competition, balancing these elements will be crucial in determining whose AI systems — and by extension, whose approaches, v...
By Keegan McBride
-
Countering the Digital Silk Road: Brazil
Reports
Project Overview This year marks the 10th anniversary of the Digital Silk Road (DSR), China’s ambitious initiative to shape critical digital infrastructure around the world to...
By Ruby Scanlon & Bill Drexel
-
Promethean Rivalry
Reports
Executive Summary Just as nuclear weapons revolutionized 20th-century geopolitics, artificial intelligence (AI) is primed to transform 21st-century power dynamics—with world l...
By Bill Drexel
