The Chinese government has made leadership in international technology standards setting a key priority and it is working to give their firms an unfair leg up. While the U.S. government needs to defend the current voluntary, industry-led standards process in the face of this unfair competition, they also need to play a more active helping role. To do that Congress should modify the research and experimentation tax credit to allow international standard setting costs to qualify as expenditures for purpose of the credit. This will help U.S. firms better afford standards setting activities, helping them win over China.
What makes standards and the standard-setting process even more important now is the geopolitical context. Technology is the main enabler of economic, political, and military power.
Standards are universal technical specifications agreed to usually by commercial actors, and sometimes involving governments and non-governmental organizations. The standard-setting process is a voluntary one, typically conducted on an international basis and led by industry. The spirit and intent of standard-setting is based on technological merit; the best technology is chosen as standard.
When standards are global, they underpin interoperability around the world and facilitate trade. Think, for example, of how one can seamlessly use a new smart phone almost anywhere in the world. A concerted effort toward standardization eliminated the need to swap SIM cards to connect to another country’s cellular network. At the same time, charging that phone abroad is likely to require an adapter to fit one of the 15 wall socket designs in use internationally because electric plug standards were developed before global standards were the norm.
Real the full article from RealClearPolicy.
More from CNAS
CommentaryShift toward ‘Silicon Nation’ Promotes Resilience — for American Defense, Society and the Economy
Better understanding by stakeholders of the national security and economic implications associated with robust S&T policies will drive additional incentives for pragmatic ...
By Martijn Rasser & Alexandra Seymour
ReportsRewire: Semiconductors and U.S. Industrial Policy
As the United States considers industrial policy for the first time in decades, it should learn lessons from prior government efforts to shape the semiconductor industry, in t...
By Chris Miller
VideoMartijn Rasser talks CHIPS Act with Newsy
Martijn Rasser, Director of the Technology and National Security program at the Center for a New American Security, joins Newsy to discuss the CHIPS Act, Taiwan, and the semic...
PodcastAI and the Future of War
AI safety is having a moment. To discuss why AI safety matters for national security, today China Talks have on Paul Scharre (@paulscharre), Vice President and Director of Stu...
By Paul Scharre