May 03, 2022

How AI Would - and Wouldn't - Factor Into a U.S.-Chinese War

By Ryan Fedasiuk

This article was originally published by War on the Rocks.

In March, a largely overlooked, 90-page Government Accountability Office study revealed something interesting: This summer, the Pentagon is getting a new AI Strategy.

Between shaping ethical norms for AI and establishing a new Chief Data and AI Officer, it’s clear top brass have big plans for the technology, though the report is light on the details. Released in 2018, the last AI Strategy laid the scaffolding for the U.S. military’s high-tech competition with China. But over the past four years one thing has become apparent: The United States needs a balanced approach to AI investment — one that doesn’t simply guard against threats, but also imposes costs on a Chinese force that sees AI as the key to victory.

The United States must be prepared to degrade and counter the People’s Liberation Army’s evolving suite of AI systems.

Undoubtedly, a military conflict between the United States and China would be catastrophic, and every effort must be taken to avoid such an outcome through diplomatic means. Still, “thinking about the unthinkable” is necessary for U.S. defense planners to prioritize investments and identify potential deficiencies in U.S. force posture and readiness. It’s worthwhile, then, to consider a worst-case situation where, within the decade, the U.S. and Chinese militaries become embroiled in large-scale combat in or around the Indo-Pacific.

Read the full article from War on the Rocks.

  • Commentary
    • The Hill
    • September 22, 2022
    Shift toward ‘Silicon Nation’ Promotes Resilience — for American Defense, Society and the Economy

    Better understanding by stakeholders of the national security and economic implications associated with robust S&T policies will drive additional incentives for pragmatic ...

    By Alexandra Seymour & Martijn Rasser

  • Reports
    • September 19, 2022
    Rewire: Semiconductors and U.S. Industrial Policy

    As the United States considers industrial policy for the first time in decades, it should learn lessons from prior government efforts to shape the semiconductor industry, in t...

    By Chris Miller

  • Video
    • September 13, 2022
    Martijn Rasser talks CHIPS Act with Newsy

    Martijn Rasser, Director of the Technology and National Security program at the Center for a New American Security, joins Newsy to discuss the CHIPS Act, Taiwan, and the semic...

  • Podcast
    • September 4, 2022
    AI and the Future of War

    AI safety is having a moment. To discuss why AI safety matters for national security, today China Talks have on Paul Scharre (@paulscharre), Vice President and Director of Stu...

    By Paul Scharre

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia