August 10, 2025
Scrapping AI Export Controls Is Self-Defeating
This article was originally published in The Wall Street Journal.
Aaron Ginn’s op-ed “China’s Z.ai and America’s Self-Defeating AI Strategy” (Aug. 6) mischaracterizes the purpose and effectiveness of export controls. The policy was never intended as a brick wall but as a strategic speed bump—one essential tool among many for maintaining America’s lead in artificial intelligence while limiting China’s military capabilities.
The controls on Nvidia’s H20 chips appear to have been working until CEO Jensen Huang’s lobbying secured a reversal that handed Beijing exactly what it wanted. DeepSeek’s founder admitted that the chip controls were his company’s biggest constraint. As AI’s compute demands soar, export controls allow America’s hardware advantage to deliver compounding benefits. Reversing course cedes those gains to China.
Beijing surely has two goals in mind: Signal to domestic companies that they ought to shun American technology as soon as possible, and manipulate Nvidia to reveal how it designs its chips so that Chinese GPU-makers can replace Nvidia even faster.
Mr. Ginn’s notion that “each Nvidia chip sent abroad is a new point on the board for American software and values” assumes vendor lock-in works in Leninist dictatorships as it does in free-market democracies. The Chinese regime isn’t a normal client—it’s a rival with a decades-old policy of replacing U.S. vendors with indigenous alternatives.
Beijing’s playbook should be obvious by now: It requires foreign vendors to surrender their trade secrets, then scales up domestic competitors and displaces foreign suppliers—first in China, then abroad. Xi Jinping was backing efforts to replace Nvidia long before Washington moved to restrict its chip exports. Our permissiveness gets him one step closer to that goal.
Read the full article in The Wall Street Journal.
More from CNAS
-
Podcast
Transatlantic Security / Energy, Economics & Security
LISTEN: Why It’s So Hard to Go After Russia’s Oil RevenueEmily Kilcrease, senior fellow and director of the Energy, Economics, and Security Program at the Center for a New American Security, joins the show to talk about secondary ta...
By Emily Kilcrease
-
Video
Indo-Pacific Security / Energy, Economics & Security
Bloomberg Surveillance | Geoffrey GertzJonathan Ferro, Lisa Abramowicz and Annmarie Hordern speak with Geoffrey Gertz, senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security about NVIDIA.Watch the full interview o...
By Geoffrey Gertz
-
Commentary
Energy, Economics & Security / Technology & National Security
Sharper: Chips and Export ControlsAs competition between the United States and China has intensified, advanced technology has become the latest battlefield. After years of restricting China’s access to advance...
By Charles Horn
-
Podcast
Technology & National Security
Scaling Laws: The Open Questions Surrounding Open Source AI with Nathan Lambert and Keegan McBrideKeegan McBride, adjunct senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security joins to explore the current state of open source AI model development and associated policy qu...
By Keegan McBride
