December 06, 2024
How the Chip War Could Turn Under Trump
What does the return of Donald Trump imply for the global chip war? Trump didn’t start the subsidy race — credit here goes to Chinese leader Xi Jinping — but his first administration focused the US on tech competition with China. Biden then extended Trump-era policies regarding tariffs, subsidies, and export controls. Now Trump is returning just as artificial intelligence intensifies demand for computing power.
For the chip industry, the immediate focus is tariffs. Trump’s first term drove the sector towards a costly supply chain restructuring, with electronics assembly shifting from China to Mexico and south-east Asia. More tariffs on China are certainly coming. But some south-east Asian countries whose electronics exports have driven higher trade surpluses with the US are also in the crosshairs.
If the new Trump administration wants to reset chip policy — and if it wants visible results within four years — it had better start soon.
Yet not every US chip company opposes every type of tariff. To protect industry segments impacted by heavily subsidised Chinese competitors, Washington is exploring “component tariffs” — that is, taxing imports based not on the location of final assembly but on the components inside. Today, a device assembled in Vietnam containing Chinese chips pays the tariff rate for Vietnam, not China. A component-based tariff regime would target Chinese chips, regardless of where final assembly occurs. Such a policy would fit Trump’s desire to tackle Chinese subsidies with more limited cost to companies and consumers than broad-based tariffs.
Export controls on US companies shipping AI chips and chipmaking tools to China were another Biden expansion of a Trump-initiated policy. It was Trump who first targeted Huawei. The Biden administration has since cut exports to over a hundred companies it says are Huawei-affiliated. It was Trump who worked with the Dutch government to ban sales of cutting-edge lithography machines to China; Biden expanded those restrictions.
Read the full article on Financial Times.
More from CNAS
-
Podcast
Transatlantic Security / Energy, Economics & Security
From Russia with RiskHere on the Bear Market Brief, a lot of what we focus on is, simply put, risk: what might happen, and what might it mean? On this episode, Rachel Ziemba, an adjunct senior fel...
By Rachel Ziemba
-
Richard Nephew on the U.S. military strikes on Iran’s nuclear program
Podcast
Richard Nephew, expert on sanctions and Iran’s nuclear program, joins Emily and Geoff to discuss the long history of U.S. policy towards Iran, the role of sanctions in constra...
By Emily Kilcrease & Geoffrey Gertz
-
Commentary
Energy, Economics & Security / Technology & National Security
Beyond Bans: Expanding the Policy Options for Tech-Security ThreatsStuck between a rock (the fact that banning all Chinese tech that poses a risk is expensive and impractical) and a hard place (the fact that many existing mitigation proposals...
By Geoffrey Gertz
-
Video
Indo-Pacific Security / Energy, Economics & Security
75 Years Post-Korean War: Can Trust Be Rebuilt Under the New Administration?As President Lee Jae Myung begins his term, he's taking visible steps to reset the tone with North Korea: halting propaganda broadcasts and reemphasizing past military agreeme...
By Dr. Go Myong-Hyun
