Image credit: US Army/Sgt. Brandy Mejia

June 07, 2019

Implementing new PT standards may hurt Army readiness. The service should learn from how US allies pulled it off

By Emma Moore

After nearly two decades of grinding low-intensity conflict, the U.S. military is shifting to focus on near-peer competition — and tailoring its physical fitness requirements accordingly.

The Army is currently conducting a two-year assessment and rollout plan scheduled for 2020, with 470,205 soldiers who are currently racing to prepare and train for a dramatically different six-event Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT), developed in reaction to both the demands of modern conflict and to the declining health and fitness standards of incoming recruits and soldiers. After all, overweight and physically unfit soldiers degrade readiness, take up time and resources, and burden others.

To meet this lofty goal, the Army must undertake the most significant changes to physical fitness testing since the beginning of the professionalized force in 1973 — one that, unfortunately, it is ill-equipped to tackle for a simple reason: it has no up-to-date training apparatus to support the transition. While the new standard may be important for lethality, the Army must consider innovative ways to prepare both recruits and soldiers to successfully implement this new standard — or else risk a significant impact on readiness as the military enters into strategic competition with China and Russia.

Read the full article in Task and Purpose.

  • Commentary
    • Foreign Policy
    • January 13, 2021
    Now Is a Bad Time to Weaken Civilian Control Over the Military

    The mob attacks on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 are a sudden reminder of just how vital a nonpartisan military really is—even in the United States....

    By ​Jim Golby

  • Commentary
    • Task and Purpose
    • December 16, 2020
    How to build more resilient and innovative US special operations teams

    The military is looking for the wrong solutions to support the force....

    By Lt Col Kaveri T. Crum & Emma Moore

  • Commentary
    • December 16, 2020
    Sharper: 2020

    2020 featured an ever-evolving series of national security challenges....

    By Sam Dorshimer, Nathalie Grogan, Emily Jin, Chris Estep & Cole Stevens

  • Video
    • December 13, 2020
    On GPS: Why civilians run the Pentagon

    The University of Texas, Austin's Jim Golby joins Fareed to look back at why generals have historically been kept away from serving as Secretary of Defense. Watch the full int...

    By ​Jim Golby

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia