On September 29, the European Union and United States hosted the inaugural Trade and Technology Council (TTC) meeting in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. As an official stated in advance of the meeting, analysts should not expect fireworks from the inaugural meeting. While there were no fireworks and few tactical policy recommendations, the resulting joint statement outlined the United States and European Union’s priorities moving forward in trade and technology. Several issues topped the agenda in the inaugural meeting. How these issues are addressed in the upcoming working group meetings will outline the path forward for transatlantic cooperation across a variety of areas.
The TTC joint statement identifies semiconductors as a top priority for the transatlantic allies. Shortages across the global economy and geopolitical concerns about manufacturing concentration in Taiwan, who holds 92% of leading-edge capacity, have necessitated improving semiconductor supply chain resiliency in the United States and Europe. To this end, the U.S. Congress passed the CHIPS Act in January to elevate the priority of semiconductors, and recently the U.S. Senate passed a bill appropriating $52 billion to improve semiconductor supply chain resiliency. Similarly, the EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen outlined the EU’s goals for semiconductor supply chain resiliency in her State of the Union address.
As the United States builds AI regulations, the United States should strive to align its AI Risk Management Framework with the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act.
Although von der Leyen’s speech outlined the importance of semiconductor production, Europe’s semiconductor strategy remains unclear. The absence of a clear strategy and prioritization from Europe threatens to hobble transatlantic cooperation in this domain. Without a clear vision of Europe’s priorities or goals, the partners are unable to determine complementarity in their strategies or how to chart a course forward for cooperation. Moving forward, Europe must define their overarching goals in this space. Only then can the TTC’s supply chain resiliency working group coordinate the transatlantic partner’s efforts and subsidies to create the most impact, while avoiding a subsidy race between the United States and Europe.
Developing and implementing trustworthy artificial intelligence was another focus area in the joint statement. The United States and European Union acknowledged the importance of human-centered AI and recognized each other’s regulatory regimes. As the United States builds AI regulations, the United States should strive to align its AI Risk Management Framework with the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act. Recognizing their respective regulatory frameworks in the joint statement is a good first step toward more aligned regulations on artificial intelligence, which are critical to counter authoritarian uses of artificial intelligence.
Read the full article from Encompass Europe.
More from CNAS
Personalist Strongmen: Challenges and Trends
Personalist authoritarianism is harmful to global democracy, as these regimes are the least likely form of dictatorship to democratize upon their collapse....
By Andrea Kendall-Taylor & Erica Frantz
European Strategic Autonomy: Views from Paris, Berlin, and Warsaw
Over the past year, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has spurred Europe to devote greater attention to its defense capabilities. Yet rather than providing momentum to Europe’s sta...
By Andrea Kendall-Taylor, Jim Townsend, Liana Fix, Justyna Gotkowska & Tara Varma
European Integration’s New Geopolitical Momentum
Offering more tangible benefits of accession prior to full membership will both keep candidate countries motivated to continue reforms and allow for a more gradual adjustment ...
By Nicholas Lokker
The Outlook for Ukraine in 2023
In the latest installment of our “New Year” series, we take stock of where things stand in Ukraine as we head into 2023. Over the past couple of months, the lines of territori...
By Andrea Kendall-Taylor, Jim Townsend, Michael Kofman & Lawrence D. Freedman