As Congress considers the Pentagon’s $1.2 billion request for military space systems in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and its other broader space portfolio, it would do well to consider the key factor of resilience at each decision point.
Building resilience into new defense space systems will remain challenging especially in a budget-constrained environment. It will require tough choices not just programmatically, but architecturally. The Defense Department would do well to justify their investment as not only for one orbital regime, but for the broader context of mission assurance.
Resilience is a key attribute of any defense space architecture – legacy or disruptive.
President Biden’s FY 2022 budget is out, and for policymakers and practitioners in the space community one aspect in particular is getting attention: a $1.2 billion request for various military space systems in low-Earth orbit (LEO). This includes investments by organizations reporting into the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), like the Space Development Agency, the Missile Defense Agency, and DARPA, all of which are investing in innovative space architectures and applications leveraging hardware commoditization and Software as a Service solutions. This marks a warranted and welcome trend toward innovation for these agencies – each of which should transition their reporting from OSD to the Space Force – but the question remains: why this investment in LEO architecture alone?
For the programs under the various OSD organizations, one concept appears again and again: resilience.
Read the full article from Breaking Defense.
More from CNAS
PodcastThe Potential of RPA in Government; Future of FITARA; U.S. Military Posture in the Indo-Pacific
Stacie Pettyjohn, senior fellow and director of the defense program at the Center for a New American Security, explains what the U.S. military can do to build a resilient post...
By Stacie Pettyjohn
VideoUnited States Military Strategy Should Better Match Interests, Says Defense Research Expert
Becca Wasser discusses how U.S. military strategy has been linked to outdated priorities and should better reflect the country’s interests, including protection of the homelan...
By Becca Wasser
CommentarySpiking the Problem: Developing a Resilient Posture in the Indo-Pacific With Passive Defenses
This article originally appeared in War on the Rocks....
By Stacie Pettyjohn
CommentarySecuring the Global Digital Economy Beyond the China Challenge
A revised route to digital modernization, premised on open participation, can not only offset the local costs of China’s cyber and influence power, but pave the way for an equ...
By Ainikki Riikonen