October 17, 2014
Preventing violence in a post-Kim North
How would Kim Jong Un’s removal from power affect the likelihood of North Korean violence against the United States or South Korea, and what might be done to prevent such violence?
This should be the single most important question for policymakers, and yet it seems to be the least addressed question in the public discourse on North Korea. Approaching the question as a strategist – by considering the range of potential futures based on extant evidence – would empower Korea watchers to transcend the status quo bias that so often plagues Korea analysis and structure an approach to the question that allows us to avoid both speculation and point predictions. Upon examining the range of potential North Korean leadership futures, the two types of scenarios most likely to give rise to North Korean violence are a military takeover and an internal competition for power involving competing factions.
Read the full piece at NK News.
More from CNAS
-
North Korea and Joe Biden: Principled Diplomacy Doesn't Mean Strategic Patience 2.0
Commentary
North Korea’s increased credibility as a nuclear threat and relevance to U.S. strategic competition with China will place it as a higher foreign policy priority than ever befo...
By Joshua Fitt
-
Bolton memoir: guide for how not to negotiate with North Korea
Commentary
Even self-serving interpretations of history can be useful....
By Van Jackson
-
Restoring Strategic Competence
Reports
Executive Summary For the foreseeable future, America’s Northeast Asian allies Japan and South Korea must live in the shadow of a nuclear North Korea, whose capabilities they ...
By Van Jackson
-
Do Not Forget Korean-Americans With Family Stuck in North Korea
Commentary
It is important to reflect on the still-divided families which have suffered for decades and for whom time is running out....
By Joshua Fitt
