July 18, 2018

Standing Up for Democracy

American Values and Great Power Competition

By Richard Fontaine and Daniel Twining

In its 2018 National Defense Strategy, released in January, the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump correctly identified great-power competition as the United States’ central security challenge. In recent years, rival states such as China and Russia have increased their ability to project power and undermine the U.S.-led liberal international order, even as Washington has struggled to respond. Beijing and Moscow, moreover, share a vision of a global order more conducive to their own forms of authoritarian governance. As a result, today’s great-power competition is a contest not just of nations but of political systems.

Thus far, the Trump administration has largely focused on great-power rivalry in terms of economic and military might. Its strategy documents have outlined the loss of the United States’ competitive military edge as other states have made major investments in new power projection technologies. Washington has used tariffs and other penalties in order to fight China’s mercantilist economic practices, while Congress and the administration have imposed sanctions on individual Russians accused of international transgressions.

These responses, however, are not enough. To overcome its geopolitical rivals, the United States must go beyond building a stronger military or enforcing economic rules; it must double down on its support for democracy around the world. Authoritarian powers such as China and Russia are working to subvert democracy where it exists, snuff it out where it is new, and keep it away where it is lacking. They see their assault on democracy as a matter not of values but of strategic advantage, whereby they can enhance their own power by eroding the internal cohesion of democracies and the solidarity of democratic alliances. Beijing and Moscow are on the offensive; meanwhile, Washington is hardly playing defense, much less doing what it needs to: championing a robust agenda for protecting and enlarging the free world. 


Read the Full Article at Foreign Affairs

  • Commentary
    • Foreign Affairs
    • May 3, 2021
    China and Russia’s Dangerous Convergence

    Any effort to address either Russia’s or China’s destabilizing behavior must now account for the two countries’ deepening partnership....

    By Andrea Kendall-Taylor & David Shullman

  • Podcast
    • April 30, 2021
    U.S. and Allied Withdrawal from Afghanistan, with Federica Mogherini and Lisa Curtis

    What does President Biden’s decision to withdraw all troops from Afghanistan mean for American allies? Federica Mogherini and Lisa Curtis join Andrea Kendall-Taylor and Jim To...

    By Carisa Nietsche, Andrea Kendall-Taylor, Federica Mogherini & Lisa Curtis

  • Commentary
    • April 28, 2021
    Sharper: The Next 100 Days

    As the administration marks its 100th day in office, what lies ahead?...

    By Anna Pederson & Chris Estep

  • Commentary
    • European Council on Foreign Relations
    • April 26, 2021
    Why Berlin And Washington Should Compromise On Nord Stream 2

    Progress on several pressing transatlantic issues in the next four years will depend on deep coordination and healthy relations between the United States and Germany. That bil...

    By Rachel Rizzo

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia