February 12, 2018
Strategic Innovation and Great Power Competition
At this time of disruptive transitions, the new U.S. National Defense Strategy rightly recognizes that the character of warfare is changing due to the advent of a range of disruptive technologies.[1,2] In particular, the strategy highlights rapid advances in advanced computing, big data analytics, artificial intelligence (AI), autonomy, robotics, directed energy, hypersonics, and biotechnology, which are characterized as “the very technologies that ensure we will be able to fight and win the wars of the future.”[3] The emergence of and unique convergences among these technologies could transform current paradigms of military power in uncertain, unpredictable ways. In addition, since commercial developments have been a primary driver of recent progress in many of these disparate technologies, the diffusion of advances will occur much more quickly and prove difficult to constrain, especially with the free exchange of ideas and talent across borders. In recent history, military-technical advantage has been a key pillar of U.S. military predominance. However, today’s trends, including China’s rapid emergence as a scientific powerhouse, seem unlikely to allow for the U.S. or perhaps any actor to achieve uncontested edge, and poor policy choices could lead to disadvantage.
Read the full article in Strategy Bridge.
More from CNAS
-
Sharper: Industrial Policy
Commentary
Lawmakers in Washington have increasingly pushed for legislation to address key industry vulnerabilities and better position the United States as a leader in critical technolo...
By Anna Pederson, Drisya Antose & Hannah Kelley
-
The CCP’s new strategy for attacking Taiwan, cyber attacks and military exercises
Video
Alexandra Seymour joins VOA to discuss recent cyberattacks on Taiwan. Watch the full interview from Voice of America....
By Alexandra Seymour
-
Ryan Fedasiuk joins the ConversationSix podcast
Podcast
Adjunct fellow Ryan Fedusiak outlines why the United States keeps failing to compete with China in high-tech, strategically important industries — and how we can avoid repeati...
By Ryan Fedasiuk
-
Help U.S. Companies Compete Against China on Technology Standards
Commentary
What makes standards and the standard-setting process even more important now is the geopolitical context. Technology is the main enabler of economic, political, and military ...
By Martijn Rasser & Robert D. Atkinson
