May 25, 2018

Tell voters in real time if adversaries like Russia try to hack and manipulate elections

By Shawn Turner

This month’s primaries mark the official kickoff of an election cycle that will carry major consequences for America and the world. Yet questions loom over whether voters can or should have confidence in the information that will drive their decisions this fall.

During the 2016 presidential election, the intelligence community determined conclusively that at the direction of Russian President Vladimir Putin, the Russian government engaged in simple yet sophisticated influence operations targeting U.S. voters. By leveraging social media platforms, exploiting grassroots movements, and planting false narratives in online news forums, the Russians sought to intensify America’s existing political, social and cultural tensions.

We also learned recently that Cambridge Analytica — the British firm associated with former Donald Trump adviser Steve Bannon — actively pursued tactics to suppress voter turnout during the 2016 presidential campaign. And of course there was the notorious role of WikiLeaks in circulating hacked emails from the Democratic Party.

It remains unclear whether the widespread efforts to stoke America's ideological and political divisions influenced the outcome of the election. What is clear is that virtually nothing has been done to prevent Russia or firms like Cambridge Analytica from repeating the same behavior during the 2018 election cycle.

Read the Full Article at USA Today

  • Commentary
    • Inkstick
    • April 2, 2021
    How Zoom has Reduced Barriers to Entry in National Security

    The shift to the virtual environment assists those who may have been overlooked in the past....

    By Katherine L. Kuzminski

  • Commentary
    • INKSTICK
    • March 12, 2021
    The Trans Ban Is Gone but More Needs To Be Done

    Simply lifting the ban isn’t enough to counteract the discrimination transgender service members and veterans continue to face....

    By Nathalie Grogan

  • Commentary
    • March 3, 2021
    Sharper: Civil-Military Relations

    The so-called “civil-military divide” has increasingly defined the relationship between America's civil society and its armed forces....

    By Cole Stevens, Nathalie Grogan & Chris Estep

  • Commentary
    • February 17, 2021
    Sharper: National Security's Next Generation

    The need to amplify new and diverse voices in national security policymaking has never been clearer....

    By Chris Estep, Ainikki Riikonen & Cole Stevens

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia