Tech debates, AI included, often boil down to a tug-of-war between open and closed systems.
On one side, open allows interoperability, customization, and integration with third-party software or hardware. Champions highlight how openness promotes transparency, accountability, competition, and significant innovation. On the other side, defenders of closed systems argue that they are more stable and secure and better protect their owners’ property interests.
The debate over finding that balance is most advanced in Europe, where policymakers are moving forward with the AI Act.
Last week, two leading United States senators tipped the US AI debate between open and closed toward the latter. Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Josh Hawley (R-MO), the two leaders of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology, and the Law, wrote a letter to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to express concern about Meta’s public release of LLaMA, a large language model (LLM) developed in-house by the company.
Read the full article from China Talk.
More from CNAS
Behind China’s Plans to Build AI for the World
To compete with China’s efforts, the United States needs a far more expansive vision of how to empower other nations with the education, tools and infrastructure needed to jum...
By Bill Drexel & Hannah Kelley
U.S.-China Competition and the Race to 6G
China views telecommunications as central to its geopolitical and strategic objectives....
By Sam Howell
Biden Took the First Step With AI Commitments — Now It’s Congress’ Turn
One of the keys to tackling these risks is developing advanced methods to train effective AI systems while maintaining Americans’ privacy....
By Josh Wallin
Time to Act: Building the Technical and Institutional Foundations for AI Assurance
Assurance for AI systems presents unique challenges....
By Josh Wallin & Andrew Reddie