Image credit: Westend61/Getty Images
April 21, 2020
The Defense Department Needs a Real Technology Strategy
Defense Department leaders agree the U.S. military must reinvigorate its technological edge. They just can’t agree on which technologies matter. Nor do they appear to be laying out arguments that would help the rest of the Pentagon, lawmakers, and industry understand which technologies will matter most in tomorrow’s wars, and therefore which should receive top priority in terms of effort and funding. In short, DOD needs a technology strategy.
Former Deputy Secretary of Defense Robert Work made artificial intelligence and autonomy the centerpiece of his “Third Offset Strategy.” Current Defense Undersecretary for Research and Engineering Mike Griffin has called hypersonics his top priority, with directed energy a close second. That would seem to be at odds with his boss, Defense Secretary Mark Esper, who has declared AI his “number one.” Yet the past two years have seen Griffin issue formal guidance about 10 to 13 “priority” technologies, with AI, hypersonics, and nuclear modernization occupying the top spot, depending on the list. But they can’t all be number one, and conflicting guidance from senior DoD leaders isn’t helpful for establishing real priorities in defense spending.
Read the full article in Defense One.
More from CNAS
-
China Is Flirting With AI Catastrophe
Commentary
Today’s AI sprint would not be the first time Beijing’s desire to hasten progress invited disaster....
By Bill Drexel & Hannah Kelley
-
Congress ponders regulation of powerful emergent A.I. platforms
Podcast
Can Congress keep up with the pace of growth in artificial intelligence? Paul Scharre of the Center for a New American Security talks about the current attempts to regulate A....
By Paul Scharre
-
Chinese Data Restrictions Undermine US-China Stability
Commentary
By refusing dialogue, China increases the risk of miscalculation, crises, and even conflict....
By Paul Scharre
-
Controlling Access to Advanced Compute via the Cloud: Options for U.S. Policymakers, Part I
Commentary
We do not recommend controlling access to cloud computing services for entities in China, because, based on our analysis, it does not appear feasible and may have adverse cons...
By Hanna Dohmen, Jacob Feldgoise, Emily Weinstein & Tim Fist
