January 23, 2024
The EU AI Act could hurt military innovation in Europe
The new year has brought more news about the European Union’s (EU) Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act. The final text of the EU AI Act was solidified in January of this year and became the first broad regulation controlling AI development and use. In 2023, Věra Jourová, Vice President of the European Commission for Values and Transparency, argued that the regulation will “intervene only where necessary, allowing AI to flourish.” The law intentionally avoids directly regulating the militaries of member states. While the EU has thus far avoided the creation of an AI governance tool constraining EU militaries directly, the dual use nature of the technology will undoubtedly mean the EU AI Act will impact military innovation among member states during the development of systems.
The AI Act and similar legislation like it could have negative downstream effects in the ability of companies to develop highly useful systems that will enable future military capabilities.
Under the law, AI systems are categorised into four groups. In the bottom tier, systems viewed as having minimal or no risk simply must comply with existing regulation. Second are systems viewed as having limited risk or transparency risk. These are products which pose a noticeable threat to European fundamental rights, as a result additional transparency obligations would be required. Third, high-risk systems are those with the ability to “negatively affect safety or fundamental rights.” AI that falls into this category will need to undergo screening before being placed on the market and require further evaluation during the lifecycle of the system. Finally, there is a category for unacceptable risk, which includes systems that in various ways pose a threat to humans and their livelihoods and should subsequently be banned. Examples include systems capable of behavioural manipulation, emotion recognition, and biometric categorisation.
A finalised version of the EU AI Act attempts to carve out an exemption for member state militaries. As the European Commission has noted the law “Does not apply to AI systems that are exclusively for military, defence or national security purposes, regardless of the type of entity carrying out those activities.” This is easier said than done.
Read the full article from Encompass Europe.
More from CNAS
-
Reports
Technology & National Security
The Entanglement EdgeExecutive Summary Quantum networking—technologies that transmit quantum states between nodes—is an underappreciated but potentially consequential dimension of U.S.-China quant...
By Constanza M. Vidal Bustamante & Morgan Peirce
-
Podcast
Technology & National Security
The U.S.–China Deep Tech Arms RaceIn this episode of TechSurge, host Michael Marks speaks with Vivek Chilukuri, Senior Fellow at CNAS, where he focuses on U.S.–China technology competition, AI policy, and digi...
By Vivek Chilukuri
-
Commentary
Technology & National Security / National Security Law
CNAS Insights | The Case for Long-Term CISA 2015 ReauthorizationLast fall, one of the United States’ most important cyber defense laws expired. For six weeks, the private sector no longer had legal protections to share critical cyber threa...
By Carrie Cordero & Morgan Peirce
-
Commentary
Technology & National Security
Taiwan Is the Key to AI DominanceA country determined to win the defining technological race of the century can’t allow its chief rival to control the industrial base on which that race depends....
By David Feith
