February 19, 2025
Ukraine Symposium – The Continuing Autonomous Arms Race
As Russia’s invasion of Ukraine drags into a grueling war of attrition, both sides are intensifying efforts to achieve a battlefield breakthrough with technological innovation. The invasion has sparked a rapid proliferation of low-cost drones and robotic systems that have fundamentally reshaped modern warfare, increasing reliance on autonomous and remote-controlled technologies.
The conflict has evolved into a hybrid battlefield where unmanned systems increasingly support conventional forces, transforming the nature of combat. Ukrainian territory has become a testing ground for the future of warfare, where emerging technologies and tactics are rapidly shaping the conflicts of tomorrow. In 2023, Ukraine claimed it was already deploying autonomous drones without human oversight that hit Russian targets. In the words of Mick Ryan, a former major general in the Australian Army, “Undoubtedly, the last three years have been the most innovative period for remotely operated, semi-autonomous, and autonomous systems since they were first introduced during the Second World War.”
This war-powered technology race does not appear to be losing steam, and what happens on the battlefields of Ukraine can potentially define how belligerents use military autonomy in other armed conflicts.
The true cost of this war laboratory is often borne by civilians, who may suffer the most devastating consequences of relentless innovation on the battlefield. One of the biggest challenges for regulators in Ukraine and the West is developing autonomous systems that comply with international law while facing an enemy that operates without restrictions. Yet the pace of battlefield innovation is moving so quickly that regulators have a hard time legislating to keep up with the realities on the ground.
Drone Warfare in Ukraine
In a November 2023 interview with The Economist, Ukraine’s former commander-in-chief, Valerii Zaluzhnyi, compared the battlefield to the great conflicts of a century ago. “Just like in the First World War, we have reached a level of technology that puts us into a stalemate,” he stated, emphasizing the challenges of modern attritional warfare. Zaluzhnyi concluded that breaking the deadlock would require a significant technological leap that also involved unmanned and robotic systems, admitting, “There will most likely be no deep and beautiful breakthrough.”
Read the full article on Lieber Institute.
More from CNAS
-
Commentary
Technology & National Security / National Security Law
CNAS Insights | The Case for Long-Term CISA 2015 ReauthorizationLast fall, one of the United States’ most important cyber defense laws expired. For six weeks, the private sector no longer had legal protections to share critical cyber threa...
By Carrie Cordero & Morgan Peirce
-
What’s Behind the Pentagon Scrapping the Deployment of 4,000 U.S. Troops to Poland?
Video
They were ready to go — until the order came to stand down. More than 4,000 U.S. troops won’t deploy to Poland as planned. Former Pentagon official and Senior Fellow at the Tr...
By Jim Townsend
-
Commentary
Technology & National Security
Taiwan Is the Key to AI DominanceA country determined to win the defining technological race of the century can’t allow its chief rival to control the industrial base on which that race depends....
By David Feith
-
Reports
Transatlantic Security / Global Swing States
Beyond the SahelRussia has been expanding its engagement in Africa under President Vladimir Putin, seeking to increase Russia’s access to resources (either natural or military, including port...
By Kate Johnston, Valeria Allende & Isabel Dlabach
