March 22, 2021
Want an Agile Pentagon? Don’t Go Chasing ‘Waterfalls’
In the absence of something better, the Pentagon churns out strategies every four years, releases already-outdated guidance and concepts, and issues five-year spending programs that would be familiar to Soviet planners. It is no way to keep ahead of China’s military modernization or technological disruption. There is a better way to manage complex processes like these, and some Pentagon and Congressional staff know it — if only they would just use it.
It’s called agile development — a concept from the software industry, where it has largely replaced the traditional “waterfall” method. The Biden administration should apply the same principle for developing strategy and translating it into concepts and capabilities.
Clinging to familiar, outdated processes will provide little comfort when China surpasses the United States as the world’s foremost military power.
In the waterfall method, software developers collect requirements in spreadsheets, hand them off to engineers who did not always understand the root problems their products were solving, and then delivered technical solutions that sometimes were outdated by the time they released the software. This should sound unsettlingly familiar to anyone in the Defense Department’s requirements and acquisition processes.
Read the full article from Defense One.
More from CNAS
-
The DownLink: The U.S. National Space Council is Back in Business
Podcast
This week U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris convened the Biden Administration’s inaugural National Space Council meeting. It had three agenda items: STEM education, to create ...
By Sarah Mineiro
-
Who’s to Blame for Asia’s Arms Race?
Commentary
As Beijing has grown stronger, it has also become increasingly belligerent....
By Tom Shugart
-
For JADC2 to Have a Chance, DoD Needs to Get Serious About Data Standards
Commentary
We are past the tipping point where information and decision-centric capabilities are more important instruments of war than kinetic weapons....
By Robert O. Work & Billy Fabian
-
The U.S. Military and the Coming Great-Power Challenge
Commentary
Simply put, China and Russia had no interest in joining a U.S.-led international order. They had long rejected it. They had only lacked the means to openly contest it....
By Dr. Andrew Krepinevich, Jr.
