February 18, 2022

Will Biden’s ‘Severe Costs’ on Russia Include Cyber Attacks?

What if the “severe costs”—the damage the United States and its allies cause to the Russian military and government should they invade Ukraine—comes not with just sanctions, but through the use of cyber operations? Will we ever know?

Despite all of the attention paid to the deployment of 3,000 U.S. troops to Poland to support NATO’s defense, satellite images of Russian troops amassed on the Ukrainian border, and potential sanctions if Putin opts to invade, we simply don’t know what actions may or may not be taken in cyberspace by the U.S. government or NATO. But we should know something. Congress and the Biden administration should use this moment to ensure that, whatever Americans are told, it is the best possible and most transparent understanding of how their government is protecting the nation and its allies.

The lack of openness about how nations are operating in the cyber domain may be limiting the world’s understanding of what activities may be going on behind the scenes.

So far, the White House and intelligence offices at the FBI, National Security Agency, and Department of Homeland Security are actively warning about Russian state-sponsored malign cyber activity, but the U.S. government does not articulate how it might respond. This outdated lack of transparency about the true conduct of 21st century asymmetric war—or hostile activity below the threshold of war—clouds the domestic and geopolitical debate and hinders our ability to formulate policy options and inform decisions about military preparedness, engagements, and diplomacy.

Read the full article from Defense One.

  • Commentary
    • May 27, 2025
    Balancing Act: Ensuring the National Guard Can Meet Its Missions

    Taren Dillon Sylvester is a research assistant for the National Security Human Capital Program at the Center for a New American Security. In February 2025, New York Governor K...

    By Taren Sylvester

  • Commentary
    • May 27, 2025
    Extremist Militias on Federal Duty

    “Unorganized militia” is a statutory term that even most national security experts have never heard. Yet, in an instant it could go from a cobwebbed corner of the U.S. Code to...

    By Dakota S. Rudesill

  • Commentary
    • May 20, 2025
    Protecting the Integrity of the National Guard

    Posse comitatus, which is both a general principle and a criminal statute enshrined in the Posse Comitatus Act (PCA), dictates that there should be a clear separation between ...

    By Claire Finkelstein

  • Commentary
    • May 20, 2025
    Preventing the Use of the National Guard to Evade the Posse Comitatus Act

    Limitations on military involvement in civilian affairs have been a central feature of Anglo-American law for centuries. Armies are equipped and trained to vanquish enemies. I...

    By Elizabeth Goitein

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia