August 08, 2018

China Doesn’t Want to Play by the World’s Rules

Beijing's plans are much bigger than the trade war.

By Abigail Grace

U.S. President Donald Trump’s most recent threat to target all $505 billion in annual Chinese imports to the United States is only the latest development in the looming U.S.-China trade war. While Trump and his team are preparing for an economic competition focused largely on tariffs, policymakers must prepare for a multi-domain competition rooted in Chinese political posturing, domestic propaganda, and economic coercion targeting American firms operating in China. These unconventional challenges will demand a comprehensive U.S. response.

Many Americans agree that solving the distorted U.S.-China economic relationship is critical. But the answer isn’t to be found in trade alone. The root of this problem is not the deficit, but China’s deeply held belief that it is not beholden to the same rules as other nations.

In the trade war, the U.S. toolbox remains limited in comparison to what China’s state-directed economy can wield. Trump remains politically constrained by a Congress understandably eager to roll back his tariffs on U.S. allies, and he is fighting pushback from the U.S. private sector, keen to protect its investment in China at all costs. In contrast, Chinese President Xi Jinping sits at the top of an authoritarian system that enables him to implement policy virtually unchecked. The vast reach of the CCP’s apparatus can be used to support behavior that falls outside of World Trade Organization norms, such as boycott measures, baseless customs restrictions, and export bans, in the pursuit of victory.

To date, China has responded to U.S. tariffs dollar for dollar. The pending round of $200 billion in additional tariffs will be challenging for China to match, given the trade imbalance. Chinese officials have publicly stated that they intend to take “qualitative” measures in response to U.S. tariffs. If these measures look anything like China’s past actions targeting South Korea’s Lotte Mart stores, Japan’s rare earth minerals, and Norwegian salmon, we should anticipate massive state-enabled economic coercion targeting U.S. private-sector interests operating in China.


Read the Full Article at Foreign Policy

  • Congressional Testimony
    • November 30, 2022
    Opportunities and Challenges for Trade Policy in the Digital Economy

    This hearing addresses digital trade, and I will focus my testimony on the national-security problems in this area posed by China – specifically, concerns about China’s open a...

    By David Feith

  • Commentary
    • Foreign Affairs
    • November 30, 2022
    Xi Jinping in His Own Words

    The contest between democracies and China will increasingly turn on the balance of dependence; whichever side depends least on the other will have the advantage....

    By David Feith, Matt Pottinger & Matthew Johnson

  • Commentary
    • Foreign Affairs
    • November 18, 2022
    Taking on China and Russia

    Today Washington has chosen, perhaps by default, to compete with—and if necessary, confront—both Russia and China simultaneously and indefinitely....

    By Richard Fontaine

  • Podcast
    • November 13, 2022
    U.S. May Seek to Stabilize Relationship with China at Crucial Meeting

    ABC NewsRadio's Thomas Oriti spoke to Jacob Stokes, Senior Fellow for the Indo-Pacific Security Program at the Center for a New American Security on U.S.-China Relations, as P...

    By Jacob Stokes

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia