June 08, 2018

Congress must rein in White House economic national security powers

President Trump has embarked on an unprecedented use of national security authorities to implement his “America first” economic agenda. His use of national security authorities to impose trade restrictions has upended longstanding international agreements and stretched the definition of “national security” beyond the intent of Congress in the decades-old statutes that Trump has relied on. Congress needs to restore its historic role on trade and economic policy and by reforming national security authorities to limit their use to pursue economic policy.

In recent months, Trump has relied on Section 232, a national security provision in the 1962 Trade Expansion Act, as the basis to levy tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, arguing that imports from allies like Canada and the European Union undercut U.S. defense readiness. Trump has directed the Commerce Department to rely on the same legal provision to prepare potential tariffs on auto imports, with Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross asserting that “economic security is military security.”

This view would justify implementing virtually any economic policy on national security grounds. After the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission rejected a plan to require power companies to buy electricity from coal and nuclear plans, a document recently leaked suggests that Trump plans implement the requirement anyway under a 1950 law designed to ensure military readiness. Trump plans to use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law typically used to impose sanctions on rogue governments like Iran, to establish new limits on Chinese investment in the United States as part of his “get tough” approach to Chinese trade abuses.

Read the Full Article at The Hill

  • Video
    • June 6, 2025
    U.S.-India Trade Talks Show Progress, but Major Hurdles Remain, Says Strategist

    Rachel Ziemba, adjunct senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, says the U.S. and India are making progress toward a trade deal, driven by shared geostrategic ...

    By Rachel Ziemba

  • Commentary
    • Foreign Affairs
    • June 4, 2025
    Putin’s Pressure Point

    Trump’s handling of Russia diverges sharply from his approach to every other country....

    By Edward Fishman

  • Commentary
    • May 27, 2025
    Semiconductor Imports and U.S. National Security

    The Secretary of Commerce has initiated a Section 232 investigation to determine the effects on the national security of imports of semiconductors and semiconductor manufactur...

    By Geoffrey Gertz & Caleb Withers

  • Podcast
    • May 22, 2025
    AI Diffusion with Paul Scharre

    Paul Scharre, AI expert and CNAS Executive Vice President, joins Geoff and Emily to talk about Trump’s AI dealmaking in the Gulf, the rescission of the Biden-era AI diffusion ...

    By Emily Kilcrease, Paul Scharre & Geoffrey Gertz

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia