This ongoing series from Technology for Global Security (T4GS) and the Center for a New American Security (CNAS) examines the elements and potential implications of digital threats to democracy over the next ten years. This post dives into the challenges complex fragile infrastructure could pose to democracy over the next ten years.
Understanding Fragile Complex Infrastructure
Complex physical and societal infrastructures in democratic societies are becoming increasingly vulnerable. While physical infrastructure works to support the population, its design criteria is inherently a result of social planning processes. As advanced and powerful technologies rapidly diffuse, operating these tools often requires minimal resources and/or technical expertise. Therefore, a growing number of non-state actors, “hacktivists,” and individuals can target digital-physical systems. Further, malign actors are increasingly exploiting the pre-existing social fractures within democracies by targeting populations and democratic institutions.
New technologies can enable and strengthen social resilience through localized support infrastructure and social connectedness. When new technologies are integrated into society, however, they can initially create structural weaknesses, since societal norms and standards for ensuring resilience have not yet been established. In addition, lack of education surrounding proper cyber hygiene contributes to weakened societal and physical resilience.
Democratic societies are increasingly vulnerable to attack and manipulation due to systemic weaknesses. Digital gray-zone threats take advantage of Western societies by further dividing and weakening government, industry, and civil society—precisely the institutions necessary to defend against these complex threats. Malign actors and political/private sector adversaries could capitalize on these vulnerabilities to worsen pre-existing tensions and exploit economic, political, racial, ethnic, and gender fault lines. Reality apathy, digitally impaired cognition, and weakened media institutions further contribute to a weakened societal resilience.
Vulnerability of Physical Infrastructure
Emerging technologies are increasing the interconnected nature of physical infrastructure. Critical infrastructure has been increasingly integrated with information and communication technologies, making key parts of society reliant on digital systems to operate. As a result, disruption or damage to one part of the system can rapidly spread to another—making complex infrastructure such as power plants, telecommunications, energy centers, and transportation systems attractive targets for malign actors.
The rapid proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) devices further increases the vulnerability of various critical elements of public and private infrastructure. Put simply, more devices online equates to more potential pathways and targets for attacks. Several technical components of these new systems make them more effective facilitators of digital espionage and attacks:
- Lethal malware deployed in critical infrastructure with “killer code” enables the possibility of large-scale, fatal consequences in the physical world.
- Software-based 5G systems will be more vulnerable than prior networks because there are no choke points to shut off systems that are under attack. In the rush to 5G, nations still have not fully dealt with the vulnerabilities and weaknesses of 4G, or even earlier predecessors.
- The open architecture of mobile cloud computing makes it particularly vulnerable, as does the versatility of mobile terminals, providing multiple avenues through which attacks can be launched.
The speed at which technology is evolving enables complex cyber-attacks faster than the equivalent cybersecurity defenses can adjust—much less the appropriate or necessary policies—causing circular shifts in the digital offense-defense balance. Cyber-attacks can have physical impacts by taking out power grids, transportation systems, telecommunications, and digital systems—increasingly putting human lives directly at risk.
Vulnerable Nations Make Vulnerable Societies
Digital asymmetric warfare targets physical infrastructure as well as the population. It often involves difficulty attributing attacks that may be traced back to proxy groups operating on behalf of foreign governments. Potential effects to democracy could be a sense of loss of power and awareness for citizens, resulting in further diminishing the perception of democratic institutional legitimacy.
Telecommunications and supply chain infrastructure are both a physical and social vulnerability. A lack of resilient infrastructure within U.S. telecommunications systems could affect democracy by increasing reliance on external actors for the ability of the populace to communicate—a vulnerability for democracies built on the backbone of independence. As 5G security researchers Ahmad and Kumar write, “5G will connect critical infrastructure that will require more security to ensure safety of not only the critical infrastructure but safety of the society as a whole.”
Democracies must cease pushing their vulnerabilities ‘under the rug’ and instead seek ways to incite systemic change that will strengthen social and physical infrastructure resilience.
Read more in Future Digital Threats to Democracy, a commentary series from CNAS and Technology for Global Security about the elements and potential implications of digital threats to democracy over the next ten years.
More from CNAS
CommentaryShift toward ‘Silicon Nation’ Promotes Resilience — for American Defense, Society and the Economy
Better understanding by stakeholders of the national security and economic implications associated with robust S&T policies will drive additional incentives for pragmatic ...
By Martijn Rasser & Alexandra Seymour
ReportsRewire: Semiconductors and U.S. Industrial Policy
As the United States considers industrial policy for the first time in decades, it should learn lessons from prior government efforts to shape the semiconductor industry, in t...
By Chris Miller
VideoMartijn Rasser talks CHIPS Act with Newsy
Martijn Rasser, Director of the Technology and National Security program at the Center for a New American Security, joins Newsy to discuss the CHIPS Act, Taiwan, and the semic...
PodcastAI and the Future of War
AI safety is having a moment. To discuss why AI safety matters for national security, today China Talks have on Paul Scharre (@paulscharre), Vice President and Director of Stu...
By Paul Scharre