October 29, 2018

How to tell if North Korea is serious about denuclearization

Since the Singapore summit between US President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un in June, Pyongyang has made gestures and statements suggesting that it will curtail its nuclear-missile programs. However, in the absence of a nuclear deal between Washington and Pyongyang, the North’s nuclear arsenal continues to expand, and the regime continues to violate UN Security Council Resolutions that prohibit nuclear and missile-related activities.

With preparations for a second Trump-Kim summit underway, how should the international community determine what initial denuclearization steps really count? As Washington and Seoul engage with North Korea diplomatically, they have a rare opportunity to persuade the regime that surrendering its nuclear weapons and programs will in fact lead to a brighter future and eventual peace on the Korean Peninsula. But observers need to distinguish steps that are symbolic at best from those that demonstrate Pyongyang’s seriousness. Grabbing hold of whatever Pyongyang offers indiscriminately will only weaken Washington’s future negotiating position.

Before deciding what does constitute a meaningful or serious offer from North Korea, it is helpful to consider what does not. The broad targets of North Korea’s denuclearization should include: the regime’s fissile and thermonuclear material production programs, its nuclear weaponization program, its nuclear weapons and related missiles and other delivery systems, its proliferation programs, and its illicit trade and smuggling networks. Each element is comprised of various facilities, materials, and technologies. With that level of complexity, North Korea could divide each target into multiple steps to offer as bargaining chips, a tactic known as “salami slicing.” And while some initial steps in isolation may be noteworthy or even meaningful, they could actually become relatively meaningless depending on the context.

Read the full article in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.

  • Podcast
    • June 20, 2025
    The U.S. and India–Pakistan Tensions with Lisa Curtis | The Ballpark Podcast

    To discuss the US’ part in brokering a ceasefire, and the US’ responses to disputes between India and Pakistan over the past three decades, in June 2025 the Phelan US Centre s...

    By Lisa Curtis

  • Reports
    • June 18, 2025
    Quad: The Next Phase

    Executive Summary The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) among the United States, Australia, India, and Japan is becoming the focal point for economic and technological co...

    By Lisa Curtis, Kareen Hart, Ryan Claffey, Keerthi Martyn & Thomas Corel

  • Commentary
    • War on the Rocks
    • June 18, 2025
    America’s Middle East Trap is China’s Strategic Windfall

    China’s approach to any escalation in the Middle East reflects its broader strategy of free-riding on U.S. security commitments....

    By Adham Sahloul

  • Video
    • June 13, 2025
    U.S.-Japan Relations Under the Trump Administration 2.0

    In this thought-provoking discussion, Richard Fontaine, CEO of CNAS and co-author of “Lost Decade”; and Ken Jimbo, president of Asia Pacific Initiative at the International Ho...

    By Richard Fontaine

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia