May 03, 2019
The 5G Future Is Not Just About Huawei
This week, representatives from the United States and more than 30 European Union and NATO countries met in Prague to hash out security principles for 5G—fifth-generation wireless networks. The meeting was convened by Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babis to bring like-minded nations together to agree on non-binding recommendations to safely introduce 5G within their respective countries. Nonetheless, ahead of the summit, Germany and the United Kingdom decided to allow Huawei equipment as part of their 5G networks. The United States cannot adopt this approach.
Quiet quarantines and soft bans, which would be consistent with a softening diplomatic tone toward China, won’t protect U.S. digital infrastructure. Instead, U.S. President Donald Trump should sign the pending executive order that would ban Huawei and other Chinese companies from U.S. networks. Doing so would achieve two things: First, the United States’ decision to exclude Chinese companies would provide cover for allies seeking to enact their own stringent measures against China, whether outright bans or more rigorous security protocols. Second, signing the executive order would communicate that the United States seeks to protect against systemic security risks that go well beyond Huawei—that the security of 5G networks is nonnegotiable.
It is hard to overstate the value of U.S. cover on Huawei issue. Before choosing Huawei rival Ericsson to build Denmark’s 5G network, the Danish defense minister lamented that his hands were tied when it came to legislating against Huawei. Poland also signaled in January that it wanted to take a harder line against the firm, before reevaluating its stance in recent weeks. And amid warnings of Huawei’s close relationship to the Chinese state from his country’s security services, Norway’s justice minister admitted his government was looking at “steps taken in the United States and Britain” in advance of a final decision on whether to exclude the company from building its 5G network.
Read the full article in Foreign Policy.
More from CNAS
-
Video
Technology & National Security
The U.S.-Iran Stalemate Explained: How Drones and AI Are Changing WarBetween cheap-to-produce drones and artificial intelligence, the future of warfare may already be here. Paul Scharre, former US Army Ranger and executive vice president of the...
By Paul Scharre
-
Commentary
Technology & National Security
Mr. Xi Goes to Washington: An Opportunity for U.S.-China AI AssuranceArtificial intelligence is advancing too rapidly, and its ramifications too consequential, for either country to believe that competition alone is a strategy....
By Lt. Gen. Jack Shanahan
-
CNAS Insights
Technology & National Security
CNAS Insights | U.S.-China AI Agreements Need Verification, Not TrustThe upcoming Trump-Xi summit is likely to disappoint the leaders of top AI labs that have recently called for urgent, coordinated pacing of frontier AI progress. While agreeme...
By Ruby Scanlon & Janet Egan
-
Podcast
Technology & National Security
U.S. & China AI Competition Raises Questions About Risk and OversightThe United States and China are moving quickly to develop increasingly powerful artificial intelligence systems, and Lt. Gen. Jack Shanahan (Ret.), former director of the Pent...
By Lt. Gen. Jack Shanahan
