September 12, 2018

The Algorithms of August

By Michael Horowitz

An artificial intelligence arms race is coming. It is unlikely to play out in the way that the mainstream media suggest, however: as a faceoff between the United States and China. That’s because AI differs from the technologies, such as nuclear weapons and battleships, that have been the subject of arms races in the past. After all, AI is software—not hardware.

Because AI is a general purpose technology—more like the combustion engine or electricity than a weapon—the competition to develop it will be broad, and the line between its civilian and military uses will be blurry. There will not be one exclusively military AI arms race. There will instead be many AI arms races, as countries (and, sometimes, violent nonstate actors) develop new algorithms or apply private sector algorithms to help them accomplish particular tasks.

In North America, the private sector invested some $15 billion to $23 billion in AI in 2016, according to a McKinsey Global Institute report. That’s more than 10 times what the U.S. government spent on unclassified AI programs that same year. The largest share came from companies such as Google and Microsoft, as well as a number of smaller private firms, not from government-funded defense research. This reverses the dynamic from the Cold War, when government investments led to private sector innovation and produced technologies such as GPS and the internet.

China says it already holds more than 20 percent of patents in the field and plans to build its AI sector to be worth $150 billion by 2030. But while Beijing and Washington are the current leaders in this race, they are not the only competitors. Countries around the world with advanced technology sectors, from Canada to France to Singapore, also have the potential to make great strides in AI (or build on lower-level advances made by others). While this diffusion means that many more countries will have a stake in the regulation of AI, it also means that many more governments will have incentives to go it on their own.


Read the Full Article at Foreign Policy

  • Video
    • September 30, 2020
    Dangers of an AI Race

    AI has value across a range of military applications, but also brings risks....

    By Paul Scharre

  • Commentary
    • Foreign Affairs
    • August 31, 2020
    The Coming Revolution in Intelligence Affairs

    The U.S. intelligence community must embrace the RIA and prepare for a future dominated by AI—or else risk losing its competitive edge....

    By Anthony Vinci

  • Commentary
    • War on the Rocks
    • August 20, 2020
    Beyond TikTok: Preparing for Future Digital Threats

    By the end of September, the American social media landscape will undergo a profound transformation, and we cannot yet map this new terrain. President Donald Trump’s executive...

    By Kara Frederick, Chris Estep & Megan Lamberth

  • Transcript
    • June 4, 2020
    Transcript from Russian Advances in Military Automation and AI

    On Thursday, June 4, the CNAS Technology and National Security Program hosted a virtual discussion on Russian advances in military automation and AI featuring Samuel Bendett, ...

    By Samuel Bendett & Martijn Rasser

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia