June 22, 2018

The Lessons China Taught Itself: Why the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Matters

By Abigail Grace

China’s changing political landscape and the recent accession of India to the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) marks the beginning of a new chapter for one of China’s first self-founded multilateral groupings. First established in June 2001 by China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization’s initial activities were primarily focused on security, namely combatting the “three evils”—terrorism, separatism, and extremism (Shanghai Cooperation Organization, June 15 2001). This year’s leader-level summit marks the first instance in which Indian Prime Minister Modi will join the grouping as a full member, introducing a democratic counterweight into an organization historically dominated by China, and to a lesser degree, Russia.

Despite this unique constellation of actors, Western onlookers have frequently discounted the relevance and importance of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (Council on Foreign Relations, October 14 2015). Highlighting internal dissent between China and Russia, few tangible outcomes, and an under-emphasis on strengthening economic partnerships, critics of the organization paint the grouping as ineffectual. Largely absent from previous outcome-focused Western analyses is a close look at the lessons that China itself has learned on advancing its geostrategic interests through multilateral organizations.

A review of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization’s activities reveals that China perceives the organization as a blank canvas to hone its own approaches to leading on the international stage. Chinese official newspapers and netizens have described the organization as a forum for China to explore and implement a new model of international relations. Moreover, official releases from the SCO itself acknowledge the need for the group to continue refining coordination and organization mechanisms, indicating that China’s strategy for engaging the organization is evolving as the SCO’s issue set expands in scope. Thus, the current value of the SCO is as a forum for China to define and articulate its interests, shape the focus of international institutions based on its own domestic priorities, lobby its neighbors to adopt its approach, and codify those views within an internationally legitimate multilateral process.



Read the Full Article at The Jamestown Foundation

  • Commentary
    • January 20, 2021
    Sharper: Day One

    The Biden-Harris administration will confront a range of national security challenges from the moment it takes office....

    By Chris Estep

  • Reports
    • January 14, 2021
    Navigating the Deepening Russia-China Partnership

    In virtually every dimension of their relationship, cooperation between Beijing and Moscow has increased....

    By Andrea Kendall-Taylor & David Shullman

  • Commentary
    • January 12, 2021
    Harnessing Multilateralism for Digital Development

    Uneven access to digital technology is magnifying societal inequities around the world....

    By Kristen A. Cordell & Kristine Lee

  • Commentary
    • The Australian Financial Review
    • December 18, 2020
    Washington should keep calm and watch the Australians

    At a moment of bitter division in the United States, Australia has produced a ray of bipartisan sunshine in Washington....

    By Richard Fontaine

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia