October 05, 2021
The Neglected Agency at the Center of Biden’s China Strategy
On Monday, U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai called out China’s “lack of adherence to global trading norms” and vowed that the United States would respond by developing trade policies that protect U.S. markets against unfair economic practices and benefit American workers. The speech is one of the clearest examples thus far of the Biden administration’s intent to compete with China by countering its anti-competitive economic methods, which have flouted free-market rules, distorted the global market and involved wholesale theft of American technology and know-how.
Tai made it clear that economic tools like tariffs and export controls are central to the administration’s approach. Yet the government agency most critical to these efforts still lacks the resources and authorities it needs to accomplish its mission.
The U.S.-China competition poses a complex and evolving challenge. The Commerce Department will play a vital role in developing and implementing a winning strategy, but its ability to fulfill this role will depend on its resources and authorities.
We’re talking about the Department of Commerce. As America’s national security becomes intertwined with its economic strength and technological leadership, Commerce has an increasingly central role in protecting U.S. technology advantages, addressing supply chain vulnerabilities and ensuring long-term economic competitiveness.
The Commerce Department’s role and responsibilities have grown in size and complexity, while its capabilities and resources have not. This shift reflects the nature of the competition with China (and one of the reasons the analogy to a “new Cold War” is flawed): Economic security and advantages in non-military technology have outsize importance compared to traditional military strength. That’s still crucial, of course, but much of the day-to-day contest happens in the arena of commerce. Just as other departments, like Treasury and Homeland Security, have been revamped and restructured as their relevance to national security grew, the Biden administration needs to reform the Commerce Department’s resources, structure and authorities if its China strategy is to succeed.
Read the full article from POLITICO.
More from CNAS
-
‘Web3’ Is on the Way. Authoritarians Should Be Worried.
Commentary
If the United States embraces Web3, it could also offer a pivotal advantage in its ongoing competition with authoritarian states, especially China....
By Anthony Vinci
-
Geopolitics Keeps Overruling Cyber Norms, So What’s the Alternative?
Commentary
Once governments accept the limits of political cyber norms, they can then adapt to the messier reality of cyberspace today....
By Laura G. Brent
-
US must take proactive steps to avert future 6G security issues
Video
Martijn Rasser, senior fellow and director of the Technology and National Security Program at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS), joins Government Matters to discus...
By Martijn Rasser
-
Securing the Global Digital Economy Beyond the China Challenge
Commentary
A revised route to digital modernization, premised on open participation, can not only offset the local costs of China’s cyber and influence power, but pave the way for an equ...
By Ainikki Riikonen
