Image credit: Flickr Photo/Yuri Samoilov (CC BY 2.0) / Https://Bit.Ly/2N9a7jN / https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
April 23, 2018
The promise and peril of military applications of artificial intelligence
Artificial intelligence (AI) is having a moment in the national security space. While the public may still equate the notion of artificial intelligence in the military context with the humanoid robots of the Terminator franchise, there has been a significant growth in discussions about the national security consequences of artificial intelligence. These discussions span academia, business, and governments, from Oxford philosopher Nick Bostrom’s concern about the existential risk to humanity posed by artificial intelligence to Telsa founder Elon Musk’s concern that artificial intelligence could trigger World War III to Vladimir Putin’s statement that leadership in AI will be essential to global power in the 21st century.
What does this really mean, especially when you move beyond the rhetoric of revolutionary change and think about the real world consequences of potential applications of artificial intelligence to militaries? Artificial intelligence is not a weapon. Instead, artificial intelligence, from a military perspective, is an enabler, much like electricity and the combustion engine. Thus, the effect of artificial intelligence on military power and international conflict will depend on particular applications of AI for militaries and policymakers. What follows are key issues for thinking about the military consequences of artificial intelligence, including principles for evaluating what artificial intelligence “is” and how it compares to technological changes in the past, what militaries might use artificial intelligence for, potential limitations to the use of artificial intelligence, and then the impact of AI military applications for international politics.
Read the full article at The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
More from CNAS
-
AI Arms Race, Drone Warfare and Cognitive Enhancement with Paul Scharre
Podcast
The Grey Dynamics podcast spoke with Paul Scharre, the vice president and director of studies at the Center for New American Security (CNAS). They discussed the use of drones ...
By Paul Scharre
-
China’s Chip Industry Dismayed by Multilateral Export Controls
Commentary
The original Chinese statement takes a much more indignant tone, reading more like an impassioned call to action to the Chinese domestic semiconductor industry to get its act ...
By Emily Jin
-
It’s Time to Appoint a US Special Envoy for Semiconductors
Commentary
A special envoy for semiconductors could demonstrate U.S. leadership without acting unilaterally....
By Alexandra Seymour
-
China’s Censors Are Afraid of What Chatbots Might Say
Commentary
If Xi grows worried that, for instance, AI-powered automation will displace too many jobs and thus metastasize the risk of social unrest, he would have to make a hard choice b...
By Jordan Schneider & Nicholas Welch
