November 15, 2019
Trump’s Boasts of an Economic ‘Boom’ Are Misplaced and Misguided
President Donald Trump this week laid out his most direct case yet for staying the course in the run-up to the 2020 U.S. presidential election. In a speech to the Economic Club of New York on Tuesday, he boasted that his “America First” policies had delivered stronger-than-expected economic growth and new jobs for millions of Americans, despite the disruption caused not only by his trade war with China, but also by the tariffs he has imposed on close U.S. allies in Europe.
While most coverage of the speech focused on Trump claiming credit for leading an economic “boom,” it was more revealing in capturing how the president thinks about economic statecraft overall—and how he misconstrues it. Trump misunderstands American economic strength, the leverage it gives him over U.S. partners as well as adversaries, and what the best approach is when the United States feels the rules of the road are not in its favor.
Take energy policy, which Trump promoted in his speech as “pro-growth, pro-worker, and 100 percent pro-American.” But Trump mistakes the relative leverage the U.S. derives from its abundant domestic oil and natural gas production with absolute leverage against all other players in the global market. This is a dangerous assumption, particularly as it comes when the International Energy Agency projects that the U.S. will account for 85 percent of the global increase in oil production between now and 2030, thanks in large part to shale oil and gas resources. That level of market share makes it tempting to overreach when talking about energy independence.
Read the full article in World Politics Review.
More from CNAS
-
Principles and Policy Options for Designing Better Investment Barriers
Congressional Testimony
This testimony focuses on options for designing an effective program to address the national security risks that can arise from certain U.S. investments in countries of concer...
By Emily Kilcrease
-
U.S. Economic Security Strategy, Authorities, and Bureaucratic Capacity
Congressional Testimony
Watch:...
By Emily Kilcrease
-
Comments on Provisions Pertaining to U.S. Investments in Certain National Security Technologies and Products in Countries of Concern
Commentary
Submitted by: Sarah Bauerle Danzman (Associate Professor, Indiana University Bloomington; Senior Fellow, Atlantic Council), Tim Fist (Fellow, Technology and National Security ...
By Emily Kilcrease, Tim Fist, Sarah Bauerle Danzman, Ngor Luong & Emily Weinstein
-
Sharper: Economic Statecraft
Commentary
As competition between the United States and China escalates, and the war in Ukraine continues, countries have embraced new forms of economic statecraft to accomplish key fore...
By Anna Pederson & Charles Horn
