June 18, 2019
Addressing America's Operational Shortfall in the Pacific
The Trump administration has made a number of strong statements about the need for the United States to do more to prepare for great power competition with China. Officials have effectively set the stage for 2019 as a year in which critical progress must occur with regard to implementing posture, budgets, and policies that counter Chinese efforts to displace the United States in the Western Pacific. Unfortunately, the scope and scale of Chinese efforts over the past 25 years diminished America’s influence in Asia, particularly its role in Southeast Asia, in such a way that current U.S. actions must have a sense of urgency if they are to succeed.
The 2018 National Defense Strategy clearly articulated the top priority the Trump administration placed on handling the challenges mounted by near-peer competitors. The budget deal agreed to last March reset the baseline for defense funding at 3.5 percent of GDP and provided two years of significantly increased funding over Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 levels. These efforts, along with other trade and policy actions by the Trump administration in 2018 and 2019, reflected a renewed concern for the economic and security threat China presents to the United States and its allies in the Asia-Pacific.
Recently, the Department of Defense released its new Indo-Pacific Strategy Report. The document represents an excellent discussion of the challenges the Pentagon faces and a cross-referencing of the ongoing procurement and posture changes in the works to address them. However, it does not fundamentally address the core operational issues the U.S. military faces, nor explain how it could reduce the risk in an acceptable time frame. The Defense Department and the administration should be proposing actions to demonstrate that the United States is committed to countering the threat posed by China in the Asia-Pacific and is willing to realign its force posture and service budgets to achieve this strategic objective. These posture actions whill emphasize U.S. efforts to both assure allies and partners and deter Chinese behavior in Southeast Asia; and, should deterrence fail, these actions will enhance America’s ability to rapidly defeat any Chinese provocations that occur.
Read the full article in War on the Rocks.
More from CNAS
-
The U.S.’s China Strategy Needs New Tools
Commentary
Policymakers maintain an unparalleled capacity to push back using sanctions, export controls and investment restrictions. Trade, however, presents a unique dilemma....
By Jordan Schneider & David Talbot
-
The Case Against Foreign Policy Solutionism
Commentary
Not all problems can actually be solved—and many of today’s foremost foreign policy challenges fall squarely into that category....
By Richard Fontaine
-
Richard Fontaine on CNAS and US-China
Podcast
Richard Fontaine is interviewed by CNAS adjunct Jordan Schneider about Biden and Asia and how the new president's foreign policy team will prioritize what they want to get out...
By Richard Fontaine & Jordan Schneider
-
A Sharper Approach to China’s Military-Civil Fusion Strategy Begins by Dispelling Myths
Commentary
First, MCF is not an invention of Xi Jinping....
By Elsa B. Kania & Lorand Laskai
