June 18, 2019

Addressing America's Operational Shortfall in the Pacific

By Mark Montgomery and Eric Sayers

The Trump administration has made a number of strong statements about the need for the United States to do more to prepare for great power competition with China. Officials have effectively set the stage for 2019 as a year in which critical progress must occur with regard to implementing posture, budgets, and policies that counter Chinese efforts to displace the United States in the Western Pacific. Unfortunately, the scope and scale of Chinese efforts over the past 25 years diminished America’s influence in Asia, particularly its role in Southeast Asia, in such a way that current U.S. actions must have a sense of urgency if they are to succeed.

The 2018 National Defense Strategy clearly articulated the top priority the Trump administration placed on handling the challenges mounted by near-peer competitors. The budget deal agreed to last March reset the baseline for defense funding at 3.5 percent of GDP and provided two years of significantly increased funding over Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 levels. These efforts, along with other trade and policy actions by the Trump administration in 2018 and 2019, reflected a renewed concern for the economic and security threat China presents to the United States and its allies in the Asia-Pacific.

Recently, the Department of Defense released its new Indo-Pacific Strategy Report. The document represents an excellent discussion of the challenges the Pentagon faces and a cross-referencing of the ongoing procurement and posture changes in the works to address them. However, it does not fundamentally address the core operational issues the U.S. military faces, nor explain how it could reduce the risk in an acceptable time frame. The Defense Department and the administration should be proposing actions to demonstrate that the United States is committed to countering the threat posed by China in the Asia-Pacific and is willing to realign its force posture and service budgets to achieve this strategic objective. These posture actions whill emphasize U.S. efforts to both assure allies and partners and deter Chinese behavior in Southeast Asia; and, should deterrence fail, these actions will enhance America’s ability to rapidly defeat any Chinese provocations that occur.

Read the full article in War on the Rocks.

  • Video
    • July 15, 2020
    Closing the Deal: National Security and Investment Scrutiny

    The United States and other major economies are enhancing investment screening and export controls in areas sensitive to national security....

    By Elizabeth Rosenberg, Peter Harrell, Carrie Cordero, David Cohen, Elbridge Colby, Wally Adeyemo, Deborah Lehr, Aimen Mir & Uzra Zeya

  • Podcast
    • July 10, 2020
    Ep. 72: What “China” means in 2020

    We take a new look at what China means to American voters, and how opinions and perceptions about China have changed since President Trump took office three and a half years a...

    By Kara Frederick

  • Commentary
    • The Geopolitics
    • July 7, 2020
    In Myanmar, A Rare Glimmer of Hope for Indian Regional Policy

    In the barren, high altitude Himalayan region between China and India, a clash on June 15 left twenty Indian soldiers dead. Nationalists on both sides called for demonstration...

    By ​Coby Goldberg

  • Commentary
    • The Washington Post
    • July 2, 2020
    The U.S.-China confrontation is not another Cold War. It’s something new.

    With U.S.-China relations in free fall, the Trump administration’s chief arms control negotiator recently proclaimed that "we know how to win these races and we know how to sp...

    By Richard Fontaine & Ely Ratner

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia