August 31, 2017
Getting to Ground Truth on the Elevation of U.S. Cyber Command
One of my biggest frustrations during my time in the Office of the Secretary of Defense’s cyber policy office was the way elevating U.S. Cyber Command became overhyped. Cyber Command was created as a subordinate command within the military’s premier nuclear deterrence command, U.S. Strategic Command. There were good historical reasons for this, but my analysis convinced me there was nothing Cyber Command could undertake if it became a unified command that it could not already do as a subordinate command. Yet as cyber operations became more prominent, the chorus grew to elevate it to its own, independent command. While I never found reason to oppose such a move, I did not think the benefits were all that remarkable. The more consequential question would be when and how to separate the leadership of Cyber Command from the National Security Agency.
Read the full op-ed in War on the Rocks.
More from CNAS
-
Sources: 80% of Interceptors for Key Missile Defense System Depleted
Video
“This is a generational gap that cannot be overcome in a short amount of time, and that has major implications for U.S. military power and security around the globe.” Becca Wa...
By Becca Wasser
-
Expert Discusses Dwindling U.S. Munitions Reserve and the Effect on the Iran War
Podcast
NPR's Michel Martin speaks with Center for a New American Security Senior Fellow and Program Director Stacie Pettyjohn about the shortage of U.S. long-range precision missiles...
By Stacie Pettyjohn
-
Europe’s Dangerous Hesitation on Its Own Air Defense
Commentary
A NATO that credibly signals that it will not only attempt to defend against incoming missiles but also shoot the archer would strengthen deterrence, preventing war in the fir...
By Franz-Stefan Gady
-
The Ambiguity Spiral in Iran
Commentary
But on the whole, the best way for the United States to settle the war with Iran is to be clearer about its objectives....
By Erik Lin-Greenberg
