September 09, 2025
Melting Arctic Ice is a National Security Threat
This article was originally published on InkStick.
In late July, Russia launched “July Storm,” a major maritime naval exercise that took place across the Pacific, Arctic, Baltic, and Caspian Seas. Shortly afterwards, NATO deployed a maritime force group to the Arctic, focused on anti-submarine activities to protect undersea cables and ensure freedom of navigation in the region. These exercises came on the back of an increased focus on the Arctic as a region for geostrategic competition. US President Donald Trump’s attempts to “buy” Greenland, while clumsy, hint at the importance of the region for American national security. At the same time, the Arctic would have a critical role in the so-called “Golden Dome” missile defense project, should that come to fruition. But there is another factor driving this competition — rising global temperatures.
The United States is woefully unprepared to address the challenging and changing geostrategic environment in the Arctic. Russia, on the other hand, is positioned and primed to take advantage of the coming changes.
China’s footprint in the Arctic is already growing, and the development of civil-military capabilities in some of its established polar research stations could provide the foundation for future Arctic endeavors.
Melting Arctic ice is also making competition in the region more likely — as more energy resources and shipping lines become accessible — but it is also contributing to the overall rate of climate change. Arctic sea ice reflects solar heat back into the atmosphere, insulating the ocean below. As that ice melts, the polar cap reflects less light, further accelerating climate change. On top of that, as the sea warms, it disrupts ocean currents and weather patterns worldwide, deepening the effects of climate change in many locations.
As the effects of climate change intensify, increased competition over resources and access in the Arctic is almost inevitable — but it doesn’t have to result in conflict. Efforts to respond to the risk of conflict in the Arctic should be twofold: firstly, redoubling efforts to slow the overall rate of climate change, and secondly, ensuring the United States and its allies are adequately prepared for any potential future conflict in the region.
Read the full article on InkStick.
More from CNAS
-
The Wrong Way to Do Diplomacy With Russia
Commentary
In fact, the summit helped Putin legitimize Moscow’s grievances, giving Russians who might doubt the wisdom of the invasion reason believe that it was, as Putin promised, just...
By Celeste Wallander
-
Ukraine Negotiations: Europe’s Perspective and the Next Steps
Podcast
This week, we continue our assessment of the Trump-Putin and Trump-Zelensky meetings in August. European leaders can take solace in the fact that their presence at the Washing...
By Kate Johnston & Jim Townsend
-
Commentary
Indo-Pacific Security / Transatlantic Security / Middle East Security
A Project for a New World OrderIndeed, the gathering in Beijing suggests that the axis, rather than withering following the war in Iran in June, has momentum....
By Richard Fontaine & Andrea Kendall-Taylor
-
Understanding Russia’s Calculus on Opportunistic Aggression in Europe
Reports
Executive Summary Numerous factors are working to dissuade Russia from directly challenging NATO, but once Moscow reconstitutes its military, one scenario stands out as a plau...
By Andrea Kendall-Taylor, Jim Townsend, Kate Johnston & Greg Weaver
