November 03, 2025
To Compete with China on Military AI, U.S. Should Set the Standards
This article was originally published in Breaking Defense.
The United States and China are locked in a contest to not only lead in AI, but to shape the global landscape for its development and use. The Trump administration has declared it wants America to “solidify our position as the global leader in AI” and in July released an AI Action Plan to implement that vision. That document predominantly focused on the private sector and largely sidestepped a critical battlefield for AI’s future: forging the norms for how it is used by militaries, from devising battle plans to guiding attack drones.
The previous U.S. administration focused intently on shaping global norms for military AI. In 2021, the Pentagon released guidelines for responsible AI in the military, and in 2023 updated its policy on autonomy in weapons. The State Department rallied more than 50 countries to join a landmark declaration on the military use of AI and autonomy. Those actions were largely nonpartisan and left a legacy that the Trump administration can carry forward to generate serious substantive benefits.
The United States has an opportunity to lead in global norms and standards for military AI at a critical moment, when the foundations laid today could shape how militaries use AI for decades.
How militaries use AI could have major ramifications for global security, and the United States stands to gain if it is at the forefront of shaping its use. Following the meeting in South Korea between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, this could be a moment when the U.S. should step up and seize an advantage Washington can use to pressure Beijing.
AI systems are capable of executing increasingly complex tasks. Countries are integrating AI into their militaries and deploying it on battlefields from Ukraine to Gaza to better process information and identify targets. The prospect of highly advanced AI systems — sometimes referred to as artificial general intelligence (AGI) or superintelligence — looms on the horizon.
Read the full article on Breaking Defense.
More from CNAS
-
India-EU Trade Deal: A New Superpower Pact | PM Modi Holds Talks With EU Leaders
Video
Lisa Curtis, Director of the Indo-Pacific Security Program at the Center for a New American Security, joined CNN News18 to discuss the recent India-EU trade deal. Watch the f...
By Lisa Curtis
-
Japan Wants Calm, China Not So Much
Commentary
This article was originally published in Asian Military Review. One of the most serious China-Japan diplomatic crises in recent years unfolded in November after Chinese offici...
By Derek Grossman
-
Commentary
Technology & National Security
The Rise of the Answer MachinesThis article was originally published in Financial Times. Every spring, I take red-eyes from Austin, Texas, to Oxford, England, to teach a graduate seminar on AI and philosoph...
By Brendan McCord
-
The Ever-Changing, Unchanged Defense Acquisition System
Commentary
Introduction The defense acquisition system has been and continues to be in a period of great change, both in terms of the laws and processes that govern it and the private se...
By Susanna V. Blume
