May 15, 2018

What's Wrong with the Defense Department's 2019 Budget Request - and What Congress Can Do to Fix It

By Susanna V. Blume

The Trump administration had a rare opportunity in the 2019 planning and budgeting cycle. For most of its time in office, the Obama administration requested more for defense than Congress appropriated, and as a result was forced into a series of unstrategic austerity measures, the effects of which are not yet fully appreciated. Conversely, the Trump administration arrived in power when Congress was in a spending mood, creating space to both set a new strategic direction and actually implement the strategy with new resources. The budget request for fiscal year 2019 was the first one prepared entirely by the new administration, guided by its National Security Strategy and National Defense Strategy , along with a large influx of cash for the Department of Defense – about $40 billion above the administration’s fiscal year 2018 request. The strategy boldly emphasized strategic competition with China and Russia, so one would expect a budget that emphasizes the advanced capabilities required to retain the U.S. technological edge against those competitors – things like electronic warfare capability, advanced munitions, and artificial intelligence. Instead, the administration submitted a budget request that, with a few notable exceptions, invests heavily in legacy systems, many of which have already been in service for decades, such as the Abrams tank, the Super Hornet fighter jet, and the Apache helicopter.

Thus, the Trump administration has missed its best chance to reshape the force in accordance with the strategy, and it will not get another opportunity like the one it had in the 2019 planning cycle. Building both a new strategy and a first budget request concurrently in the first year of an administration is always challenging. However, given the additional funds the department received this year, the 2019 cycle was the best opportunity to apply those new funds to the administration’s new priorities. And there is no more new money coming

Read the Full Article at War on the Rocks

  • Commentary
    • Breaking Defense
    • November 18, 2021
    For JADC2 to Have a Chance, DoD Needs to Get Serious About Data Standards

    We are past the tipping point where information and decision-centric capabilities are more important instruments of war than kinetic weapons....

    By Robert O. Work & Billy Fabian

  • Commentary
    • Foreign Affairs
    • November 17, 2021
    The U.S. Military and the Coming Great-Power Challenge

    Simply put, China and Russia had no interest in joining a U.S.-led international order. They had long rejected it. They had only lacked the means to openly contest it....

    By Dr. Andrew Krepinevich, Jr.

  • Commentary
    • November 10, 2021
    Sharper: Global Posture

    The Department of Defense is finalizing the first global posture review of the Biden administration, an assessment of the U.S. military's global footprint. What will the admin...

    By Anna Pederson

  • Commentary
    • Lawfare
    • November 7, 2021
    Over-the-Horizon Does Not Have to Mean Next Door

    Military pressure is only one element of a broader counterterrorism strategy to prevent Afghanistan from once again becoming a launching pad for terrorist operations against t...

    By Stacie Pettyjohn

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia