August 26, 2026
The Geostrategic Case for Compute in Australia
Janet Egan is Senior Fellow and Deputy Director of the Technology and National Security Program at the Center for a New American Security in Washington, DC. Her research focuses on the national security implications of artificial intelligence. She was previously the inaugural director of policy in Australia’s Office of Supply Chain Resilience. . . . We discuss why training compute gives Australia more leverage than inference compute, whether hosting compute could also give us influence over AI safety, why copyright is a red line for the AI companies, and why Australia’s window to act is “a month or months, rather than a year”.
Watch the full interview on The Joe Walker Podcast.
More from CNAS
-
Technology & National Security
Why Empowering Private Companies to Fight Cybercrime Had to HappenThere is no question that the government needs to adapt to the reality of the evolving civilianization of the security environment. It should do so boldly, quickly, but carefu...
By Gary Corn
-
Technology & National Security
From Classified to Commercial: Anthony Vinci on Intelligence, AI, and Forecasting the FutureGary Hensley talks with Anthony Vinci, adjunct senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, CEO of Vico.io, former intelligence officer, and author of The Fourth I...
By Anthony Vinci
-
Technology & National Security
CNAS Insights | Sovereign AI’s Second Wave Is Coming Into ViewEarlier this year, CNAS launched the Sovereign AI Index to track every government-backed sovereign AI project since 2023. These projects seek to improve a country’s AI self-re...
By Pablo Chavez, Vivek Chilukuri & Ruby Scanlon
-
Technology & National Security
Is AI All Hype or the Real Deal?Anthony Vinci, an adjunct senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, joins Eyes on Geopolitics to break down the rapidly evolving AI landscape, from China’s grow...
By Anthony Vinci