January 15, 2026
U.S.-China Competition Accelerates Across the Tech Stack
This article was originally published in Just Security.
Over the course of 2025, the United States and China rapidly escalated trade and tech restrictions toward each other, then negotiated to roll them back. By the end of the year, the superpowers had established a fragile détente, with the Trump administration refraining from imposing new export controls or sanctions to retaliate for China’s cyberespionage out of fears of upsetting this shaky truce. The result is a quiet sea change in U.S. economic security policy. After years of steady progress on the China derisking policy agenda—marked by new controls on dual-use technology exports, outbound investments, and the transfer of sensitive personal data—at the outset of 2026 the Trump administration has effectively paused any new competitive actions toward China.
Any companies making business decisions on the assumption the current détente truly represents a break in the longer-term trend of heightened geoeconomic competition may be disappointed.
The trend to watch this year is how long this truce will last, and what happens to the U.S. tech protection agenda in the meantime. The Commerce Department recently withdrew plans to restrict the import of Chinese drones and the White House opted not to introduce any significant new tariffs on semiconductors. Yet even as the Trump administration studiously avoids new tech restrictions that might destabilize the status quo, other parts of the government may have an incentive to act. Late last year, Congress passed a law that codified and expanded the outbound investment rules, and there are ongoing legislative efforts to strengthen U.S. chip controls. Meanwhile the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), a regulatory agency (debatably) independent of the administration, may step in where the Commerce Department is stepping back: in late December the FCC issued its own rule restricting the import of foreign drones. Unlike Commerce’s proposed approach, the FCC rule applies to foreign drones from any country, rather than explicitly targeting China, perhaps in an effort to avoid provoking Chinese retaliation. This may become a model for additional new restrictions.
Read the full article on Just Security.
More from CNAS
-
Ziemba: Alternates Pipelines as Hormuz Pressure Remains
Risks around the Strait of Hormuz remain elevated as U.S.-Iran tensions pressure a fragile truce. Ziemba Insights founder [and Adjunct Senior Fellow at the Center for a New Am...
By Rachel Ziemba
-
After the Trump-Xi Summit, What’s Next for the U.S. and China?
This article was originally published in Inkstick. The recent Xi-Trump summit helped extend the truce the countries agreed on and created some new institutions to manage the r...
By Rachel Ziemba
-
What New Iran Attacks Means for the Future of the Oil Market
The US launched fresh airstrikes on Iran and revoked a waiver that allowed it to sell oil globally. Bloomberg Economics' Chris Kennedy, an adjunct senior fellow at the Center ...
By Chris Kennedy
-
U.S. Strikes Iranian Bridge as Tensions Escalate
The US has struck a major bridge in Iran, with casualties reported and warnings of further attacks. Tehran says it will not be pressured into a deal, raising questions over wh...
By Rachel Ziemba
