April 06, 2018

Russian Strategists Debate Preemption as Defense Against NATO Surprise Attack

By Alexander Velez-Green

Russian military and civilian leaders have long debated what to do in the face of a NATO surprise attack. One group of authoritative military strategists believes that, in the near future, defensive operations alone will be unable to stop such an attack; consequently, they are arguing for Russia to adopt a doctrine of preemption to protect its territorial integrity and vital interests. This doctrine would authorize the first use of strategic nonnuclear or limited nuclear attacks on NATO military or civilian targets once an attack on vital Russian interests seemed imminent.

The Kremlin has apparently rejected calls for preemption thus far, excluding it from the country’s successive unclassified military doctrines. But if NATO’s offensive strike forces continue to outmatch Russian defenses, or are perceived to do so, then it is this author’s view that Moscow may well pivot toward preemption, significantly increasing the risk of major war—including nuclear war—between NATO and Russia. U.S. and NATO policymakers should act now to dissuade a possible shift toward preemption by enhancing the alliance’s force resilience in Europe, cyberspace and outer space, but doing so in a way that is unlikely to exacerbate Russian fears of a NATO surprise attack.

Read the full article at Russia Matters

  • Commentary
    • Foreign Affairs
    • May 20, 2022
    A Fight Over Taiwan Could Go Nuclear

    A fight between China and the United States could very well go nuclear....

    By Becca Wasser & Stacie Pettyjohn

  • Reports
    • May 19, 2022
    Long Shadows: Deterrence in a Multipolar Nuclear Age

    Executive Summary This report examines the nuclear policies and postures of the United States and its three primary nuclear adversaries: China, Russia, and North Korea. It con...

    By Stacie Pettyjohn & Jennie Matuschak

  • Podcast
    • May 16, 2022
    War Game in Taiwan: A “home game” for China, an “away game” for the U.S.

    The year is 2027 and China has decided to attack Taiwan and bring the island nation under direct control. Now the U-S has to answer: do we fight for Taiwan’s freedom? How far ...

    By Becca Wasser & Dr. ED McGrady

  • Video
    • May 13, 2022
    CNAS Gaming Lab on Meet the Press

    In a special collaboration with NBC’s Meet the Press, The Gaming Lab at CNAS executed a strategic-operational game to provide critical insight into how a potential war with Ch...

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia