November 19, 2025
Thailand–Cambodia Border Agreement on Shaky Ground
This article was originally published on the East Asia Forum.
On 26 October 2025, US President Donald Trump presided over Cambodia and Thailand’s signing of the Kuala Lumpur Peace Accord — a joint declaration expanding the 28 July ceasefire, which halted the bloodiest Thailand–Cambodia border conflict in over a decade. Yet on 11 November, the Thai National Security Council approved a temporary suspension of the accord, suggesting that a more permanent peace will require more than just a tariff-enabled truce.
Tensions first flared in the Preah Vihear temple area on 28 May. Ambiguous border demarcations dating back to 1904 and 1907 French colonial-era treaties have kept adjacent territories — and several temple sites — contested. After two months of unsuccessful attempts by Malaysia and subtle nudging from China to defuse the crisis, on 24 July the simmering dispute escalated into armed clashes across several areas along the frontier, including around the Ta Muen Thom temple.
Trump’s initial intervention was instrumental. Yet to secure both countries’ adherence to the accord, Washington must pair continued diplomatic pressure with tangible humanitarian support and economic engagement.
Even by 25 July, as skirmishes threatened all-out war, Bangkok still resisted third-party mediation. Frustrated, Trump took to Truth Social on 26 July to announce that he had spoken with Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet. Following a similar call with Thailand’s prime minister, Trump relayed Bangkok’s willingness to negotiate to Phnom Penh and confirmed that ‘Both Parties are … looking to get back to the “Trading Table” with the United States, which we think is inappropriate to do until such time as the fighting STOPS’.
Though China remains Cambodia and Thailand’s top trading partner, the United States is their primary export market, with exports to the United States equivalent to 27 per cent of Cambodia’s GDP and 12 per cent of Thailand’s. Should the violence persist, Trump threatened to proceed with the planned 36 per cent tariffs on both Cambodian and Thai exports that would take effect on 1 August. The credible prospect of tariff relief, contingent upon mutual restraint, helped drive both sides towards dialogue.
Read the full article on East Asia Forum.
More from CNAS
-
Hearing on “India, China, and the Balance of Power in the Indo-Pacific”
Congressional Testimony
Commissioners, thank you for the opportunity to testify at today’s hearing. There are few relationships that have the potential to be as consequential to the balance of power ...
By Lindsey Ford
-
Commentary
Defense / Indo-Pacific Security
Trump’s NATO DilemmaThis article was originally published in Foreign Affairs. Last November, Matthew Whitaker, the U.S. ambassador to NATO, startled a gathering of European officials at the Berl...
By Sara Moller
-
Video
Indo-Pacific Security / Transatlantic Security
Top Experts Decode India-U.S. Trade Deal | Questions Loom Over Russian Oil Imports, $500Bn InvestmentIn this episode of India Ascends, amid US President Donald Trump's claim that India has agreed to halt purchases of Russian oil, New Delhi has reiterated that ensuring energy ...
By Daniel Silverberg
-
"Modi-Trump Share a Very..." White House on India-U.S. Deal as BJP vs Congress at Home
Video
In the wake of a high-octane year of tariff wars and diplomatic friction, a massive breakthrough has finally been reached: the India-US Trade Deal is officially here. But as t...
By Lisa Curtis
