December 20, 2024
Will Europe Send Combat Forces to Ukraine?
War is always about choosing one risk over another. For almost three years, Europe has largely behaved as if it did not have to make that choice: It could support Ukraine’s fight against Russia and keep the European security order intact—and at the same time avoid placing its own population and military forces at risk. Considering the deteriorating military situation in Ukraine, the prospect of less military aid from Washington, and the growing likelihood of a forced cease-fire favoring Russia, however, Europe’s avoidance of painful decisions may no longer be sustainable.
The pressing question is what follows a cease-fire. Here, Europe faces two options: commit to defending a cease-fire by force if necessary or risk a more brutal conflict in the coming years that may not be confined to Ukraine.
Any idea that Europe could deter Russia from breaking a cease-fire and renewing its attack with the presence of a light peacekeeping force is fantasy.
An honest reckoning is vital. Without a significant Western military presence in Ukraine, any security guarantee to what remains of Ukraine will likely be ignored by Russia. U.S. President-elect Donald Trump and his team have already bowed out of sending U.S. troops, saying this would be Europe’s responsibility. That is why French President Emmanuel Macron has been drumming up support for a European peacekeeping force. He recently visited Poland to present his case but was rebuffed. Germany’s lame-duck government also looks set to refuse. Italian Defense Minister Guido Crosetto, on the other hand, said Italy would be on board. Europe cannot escape engaging in this debate unless it is willing to risk losing Ukraine and facing a larger military confrontation in the future.
As long as Ukraine has not stabilized the front line, discussions of European troop deployments are purely theoretical. Only when Russia acknowledges that it can no longer gain meaningful victories in 2025 will it consider negotiations to freeze the conflict. We might get to this point if the incoming Trump administration follows up on signals that it may be considering an “escalate to de-escalate” strategy—in other words, to increase pressure on Russia through increased weapons deliveries to Ukraine as a way to strengthen Kyiv’s bargaining power and force Moscow to settle on reasonable terms. However, there will come a moment when Trump declares that Ukraine is now Europe’s problem, and Europe needs to be ready with a plan of action.
Read the full article on Foreign Policy.
More from CNAS
-
Transatlantic Adaptation: A More European NATO?
Doubts about U.S. reliability and the future of NATO are top of mind for most in the transatlantic community. The concerns that spiked after President Donald Trump’s threats t...
By Andrea Kendall-Taylor & Jim Townsend
-
U.S. Security Analysts Expect ‘More Europe and Less U.S. in NATO’
The Pentagon's top policy advisor has listed several possible ways the US could punish its NATO partners for refusing to join President Trump's war in Iran. Washington is repo...
By Jim Townsend
-
Markets React as Trump Orders Military Action in Hormuz
President Trump orders the U.S. military to target any boat laying mines in the Strait of Hormuz, escalating tensions with Iran and sending oil prices sharply higher. Bloomber...
By Becca Wasser
-
What Could Europe’s Loan to Ukraine Mean for Moscow?
The European Union has given a preliminary green light to unblock a $AU148 billion loan for Ukraine. Jim Townsend from the Center for a New American Security says the loan is ...
By Jim Townsend
