October 24, 2024
How Donald Trump Could Undermine the U.S. Dollar
No matter who wins the upcoming U.S. presidential election, one thing is all but certain: The United States will continue relying on sanctions as its go-to foreign policy tool. Each 21st-century American president has imposed more sanctions than the last. Donald Trump issued nearly twice as many sanctions per year as Barack Obama, and Joe Biden has already doubled Trump’s tally.
This points to a structural reality: In a world of rising tensions among nuclear-armed states, economic war is far more palatable than actual war. Yet America’s addiction to sanctions flies in the face of high-level warnings that the habit could have dire consequences. Former Treasury Secretary Jack Lew famously cautioned that “overuse of sanctions” could undermine U.S. economic leadership and herald the demise of the almighty dollar.
The point here isn’t that sanctions can’t hurt the dollar — they can. But the real danger is misuse rather than overuse.
But the past few years have taught us a key lesson: The risk isn’t in using sanctions too much, it’s in wielding them rashly and alone. And this lesson reveals that the next U.S. president’s sanctions policy could have serious ramifications for the dollar’s global role — especially if the next president is Donald Trump.
To understand this, we need to revisit 2018, Trump’s banner year for sanctions. That May, he withdrew the U.S. from the Iran nuclear deal and unilaterally reimposed all Obama-era sanctions on Tehran under the tagline “maximum pressure.” While Iran’s economy tottered as businesses fled the market to avoid U.S. penalties, the sanctions failed to achieve their goals. Without international support or a clear strategy, Iran rebuilt its nuclear program and retaliated with proxy attacks on U.S. forces in Iraq and drone strikes on Saudi oil facilities.
Read the full article on POLITICO.
More from CNAS
-
Podcast
Transatlantic Security / Energy, Economics & Security
From Russia with RiskHere on the Bear Market Brief, a lot of what we focus on is, simply put, risk: what might happen, and what might it mean? On this episode, Rachel Ziemba, an adjunct senior fel...
By Rachel Ziemba
-
Richard Nephew on the U.S. military strikes on Iran’s nuclear program
Podcast
Richard Nephew, expert on sanctions and Iran’s nuclear program, joins Emily and Geoff to discuss the long history of U.S. policy towards Iran, the role of sanctions in constra...
By Emily Kilcrease & Geoffrey Gertz
-
Commentary
Energy, Economics & Security / Technology & National Security
Beyond Bans: Expanding the Policy Options for Tech-Security ThreatsStuck between a rock (the fact that banning all Chinese tech that poses a risk is expensive and impractical) and a hard place (the fact that many existing mitigation proposals...
By Geoffrey Gertz
-
Video
Indo-Pacific Security / Energy, Economics & Security
75 Years Post-Korean War: Can Trust Be Rebuilt Under the New Administration?As President Lee Jae Myung begins his term, he's taking visible steps to reset the tone with North Korea: halting propaganda broadcasts and reemphasizing past military agreeme...
By Dr. Go Myong-Hyun
