March 23, 2021

Maximizing the Effectiveness of GloMag Sanctions

Testimony Before the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission

By John Hughes

Submitted Written Testimony

I. Strategic Assessment

Co-Chairs McGovern and Smith and distinguished members of the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission, thank you for the opportunity to testify today on the role of sanctions as a foreign policy tool, and how they can be most effective in the context of the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act (“GloMag”).

I’m honored to have the opportunity to speak today on this very important topic, and humbled to be part of this illustrious group testifying today. I applaud Congress’s work to create this important legislation that provides the U.S. government with a flexible option to use when going after those involved in human rights abuses and corruption, and one that I believe has been a valuable addition to the sanctions toolkit.

Given the likelihood of the continued use of this powerful tool in the months and years ahead, my testimony focuses on how best to maximize its impact. This includes five steps: First, sanctions must be part of a broader, clearly defined strategy that takes into account the foreign policy objectives the U.S. government wishes to achieve; second, once this strategy is developed policymakers must decide which tools can best achieve its goals. Choosing the right tools requires a sober analysis of the benefits and limitations of the use of sanctions, and how their impact can be leveraged by other tools of economic statecraft, diplomacy, foreign aid, and, for Global Magnitsky, existing human rights and corruption-focused initiatives; third, once this framework is established it is important to decide on which targets to actually sanction. This requires robust coordination across the government, and, for Global Magnitsky in particular, should also include input from relevant stakeholders in civil society; fourth, sanctions must constantly be evaluated against the stated foreign policy objectives. This should include regular impact assessments, as well as after-action reports once sanctions have been lifted; and fifth, sanctions are best when done multilaterally, and therefore this process should prioritize outreach to, and coordination with, allies throughout.

Download the full testimony.

Download PDF

  • Commentary
    • October 19, 2022
    Sharper: The State of AI

    The U.S. government's recent chip export controls are the latest salvo in the U.S.–China rivalry in artificial intelligence. Semiconductors are a key input for AI systems and ...

    By Anna Pederson

  • Commentary
    • The Atlantic Council
    • September 14, 2022
    Sand in the silicon: Designing an outbound investment controls mechanism

    Recent congressional efforts to establish new authorities to regulate outbound investment have revived a long-simmering debate in Washington about the economic and security ri...

    By Emily Kilcrease & Sarah Bauerle Danzman

  • Podcast
    • August 2, 2022
    The Cost of Economic War

    Sanctions, not bombs, have been the weapon chosen to take on the Putin regime. BBC speaks with macroeconomist Rachel Ziemba about the effectiveness of modern economic statecra...

    By Rachel Ziemba

  • Reports
    • December 7, 2021
    Containing Crisis

    As the United States and China seek to manage an increasingly tense relationship, both sides have turned to coercive economic statecraft as a core part of their broader foreig...

    By Emily Kilcrease, Emily Jin & Rachel Ziemba

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia