For 20 years, American presidents have tried to withdraw U.S. military forces from the Middle East, only to be pulled back in. As calls for the United States to completely withdraw from the region grow, policymakers must adopt a coherent strategy for more efficiently managing America's interests in the Middle East, while also identifying new opportunities for effective partnerships to strengthen U.S. competitiveness. CNAS experts are sharpening the conversation surrounding the future of U.S. strategy in the Middle East. Continue reading this edition of Sharper to explore their recommendations.
The international community may find Iran ready to consider a return to negotiations in 2021—regardless of the results in November's presidential elections. Any U.S. administration seeking diplomatic engagement with Iran, however, will be forced to deal with a number of complicated challenges. In a CNAS report, experts Ilan Goldenberg, Elisa Catalano Ewers, and Kaleigh Thomas outline a phased approach for engaging Iran in 2021 that takes into account both regional and nuclear issues.
Forging an Alliance Innovation Base
The United States is steadily losing ground in the race against China to pioneer the most important technologies of the 21st century. In a CNAS report, experts Daniel Kliman, Ben FitzGerald, Kristine Lee, and Joshua Fitt argue that Washington’s global network of alliances is a unique asset in the technology competition with Beijing. Drawing on lessons learned from detailed case studies on Japan, the authors offer a blueprint for an alliance innovation base including the United States, Israel, Norway, Australia, and Japan.
Toward a More Proliferated World?
Several trends are eroding nuclear proliferation barriers and generating new proliferation pressures. In a joint report from CNAS and the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), experts Eric Brewer, with Ilan Goldenberg, Joseph Rodgers, Maxwell Simon, and Kaleigh Thomas, survey the geopolitical forces that will shape the proliferation landscape and the United States’ ability to manage it in the next 10–20 years. The authors then apply these trends and to three countries that—for various reasons—could develop nuclear weapons within the next 10–20 years: South Korea, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey.
Demilitarizing U.S. Policy in the Middle East
Ilan Goldenberg and Kaleigh Thomas argue in the Next Defense Strategy series that "a sustainable Middle East strategy that allows the United States to pull back militarily while focusing on realistic diplomacy and a smarter assistance strategy is a central building block for shifting resources to other priorities, for example effective competition with China."
Add Economic Policy to Deterrence Planning
"From Russia and North Korea to Iran and Venezuela," Elizabeth Rosenberg and Jordan Tama write in Defense One, "U.S. presidents and lawmakers have long employed varying levels of economic pressure to alter the policies of foreign governments. Some of these tools – for instance, severing links between a country and the international financial system – can impose greater costs than some uses of military force. Yet policymakers have given too little thought to how different types of economic pressure intersect with different forms of military coercion."
9/11 Swallowed U.S. Foreign Policy. Don’t Let the Coronavirus Do the Same Thing.
Ilan Goldenberg writes in The Washington Post, "For years now, America has made the mistake of fighting the last war. Today’s crisis will inevitably force a reassessment. But we should not overreact to the coronavirus crisis nor allow it to be used as an opportunity for ideologues to pursue a narrow agenda. Instead, we must assimilate what we learn from this experience and use this moment to reimagine our foreign policy, institutions and strategic alliances for the 21st century."
Uniting the Techno-Democracies
In an essay for Foreign Affairs, Jared Cohen and Richard Fontaine argue that "the United States is arguably still the world’s leading technological power, and France, Germany, Japan, and the United Kingdom all have large economies and impressive technology sectors. Australia, Canada, and South Korea have smaller economies, but they are also important players in technology. The same is true of Finland and Sweden, which are telecommunications and engineering powerhouses. India and Israel are also logical candidates for membership, owing to the global reach of their flourishing technology and startup sectors."
Sanctions by the Numbers: Spotlight on Iran
In a recent edition of Sanctions by the Numbers, Abigail Eineman explores Iran sanctions, tracking how designations and delistings have evolved over time, the dozens of countries affected by Iran-related sanctions programs, and the top types of U.S. designations.
The American Public Wants a Sustainable Middle East Policy
"The motivation to end forever wars and reduce U.S. involvement in the Middle East is compelling," Kaleigh Thomas and Emma Moore argue in Defense One. "President Trump has himself latched onto this idea, tweeting his opposition and withdrawing some U.S. troops from Syria last fall. However, America’s best shot at preventing a 'forever war' is not a total withdrawal of U.S. troops from the region.
Congress Must Use Its Tools To Influence the Decisions of War
"In matters of peace and war, no one seems satisfied with Congress," Richard Fontaine and Loren DeJonge Schulman argue in The Hill. "Over the past two decades of conflict and despite its formal powers to declare wars, appropriate funds, and organize the armed forces, Congress has largely deferred and used more of a rhetorical fight than actively shaping American wars. But it need not be this way.
Making the U.S. Military’s Counter-Terrorism Mission Sustainable
Stephen Tankel warns in War on the Rocks, "The over-militarization of U.S. counter-terrorism efforts has had pernicious consequences both for these efforts and the U.S. military. Focusing on interstate strategic competition requires investing the mental energy necessary to develop a more sustainable approach to counter-terrorism.
In the News
Featuring commentary and analysis by Ilan Goldenberg, Kaleigh Thomas, and Peter Harrell.
Across the Center
CNAS Task Force: A New U.S. Agenda Toward the Israeli-Palestine Conflict
This June, CNAS announced its task force on developing a new U.S. agenda toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The task force, which began convening this past winter, seeks to re-examine U.S. policy given the deteriorating situation on the ground and shifting American, Israeli, and Palestinian stances on longstanding issues and how to preserve the two-state solution. The group will build on the success of CNAS’ 2018 task force on U.S. policy towards Gaza.
About the Sharper Series
The CNAS Sharper series features curated analysis and commentary from CNAS experts on the most critical challenges in U.S. foreign policy. From the future of America's relationship with China to the state of U.S. sanctions policy and more, each collection draws on the reports, interviews, and other commentaries produced by experts across the Center to explore how America can strengthen its competitive edge.
Sign up to receive the latest analysis from the CNAS expert community on the most important issues facing America's national security.
More from CNAS
CommentaryCould Europe’s INSTEX Help Save the Iran Nuclear Deal?
Supporting INSTEX would illustrate not only that “America is back,” but that the Biden administration is taking humanitarian concerns seriously without sacrificing security in...
By Francis Shin
ReportsSanctions by the Numbers
Sanctions designations remained high in 2020, with 777 designations compared to 785 in 2019....
By Sam Dorshimer & Francis Shin
CommentaryA Joint Warfighting Concept for Systems Warfare
Future combat between peer and near-peer adversaries will be characterized, dominated, and decided by the collision of opposing systems of systems....
By Robert O. Work
2020 featured an ever-evolving series of national security challenges....
By Sam Dorshimer, Nathalie Grogan, Emily Jin, Chris Estep & Cole Stevens